User talk:Alsace38

please read and react to my comment at Talk:Phrygian language. You are very welcome to compile a Phrygian glossary, but please take it to wiktionary. Please note that there is already an effort to compile a Phrygian glossary there, see wikt:Category:Phrygian language. E.g., take the material you have collected on bekos and insert it, together with your references, at wikt:βεκος. Thanks. --dab (𒁳) 14:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

apparently, you do not want to understand. Read WP:CITE. This isn't optional. Once you have presented quotable references, we can discuss whether your material is appropriate in the article. As long as you do not cite any references, you have no case whatsoever. --dab (𒁳) 06:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re [1], you are rather far out of line now. Take a moment to read WP:DISRUPT and WP:BLOCK. If you want to continue contributing to Wikipedia, make an effort to understand and respect the rules. --dab (𒁳) 10:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to ask you to express your opinion on this issue discussed [2]. Thanks, Aregakn (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I have deleted your comment it was in no way relevant to the discussed topic and the Article. I don't actually understand why you "hate the Armenian Genocide", but it has no influence on the Genocides you mentioned. All the issues you stated (can't tell the details) are totally righteous and correct but how the Armenian question influences those negative I cannot understand. I hope you are not telling, that 1 issue should not be discussed as it is being used by Turkey to cover others. I also want to show you, that you are falling victim to this policy of Turkey, if even you, a person concenrned with that tragic past, is having such thoughts. Once again, if wise people are not able to fight those policies of "divide and conquer" and step-by-step achieve justice for ALL, such events will always continue. For me, there is no such division of the crimes of Turkey as a state. Nothing is more prior for me and all those issues have to equally be considered. My problem is that I contribute to articles I have more information about. And, as you see, I invite others to share. If you can contribute to similar articles, we can connect them with templates or further reading etc. I can in no way accept your "pain" that 1 issue is being more discussed than an other, though I can understand it. 2 days ago I commemorated the Genocide of Pontus Greeks. Please be strong and do not give way to emotions more than to judgment and logic. I hope I could explain what I had in mind. Aregakn (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well you didn't undertand what i mean! But there something inconstestable (no-rufuse) what you should know, all over the world armenians seems to be the only martyrs of turkish barbaries! They are selfish, they don't care of kurds or assyrians, and everwhere they are building monuments of "armenian genocide", and they never mention, and they will never mention "kurd or assyrian or greek"! You cannot say that i am wrong, it's the truth, but however, turk+azeri+arab+laz+çerkez+turkmen+nomad killed 1.500.000 armenian, 600.000 kurd, 450.000 assyrian! Since decenies armenians are considering themselves as the only martyr people due to turkish repression! I have spoken with so much armenians or turks, but some personns loves kurds or armenians, the other are r....--Alsace38 (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did say on your page that you perceive things in the wrong way and falling victim of the desire of Turkey to concentrate the attention on 1 thing of the past. Your expressions about the Genocide are unacceptable and I see and cannot see any, as u called, "selfish" Armenian that would allow themselves to express such opinion on Greek, Assyrian or other issues. I am not aware of any case that Armenian diaspora did not advocate the other issues.

I cannot be sure, but it sounds like enviness towards the armenian genocide case from your side, and that is what is selfish. Assyrians were and are always welcome in armenia both those nations, as well as greeks are closely related to each other ethno-historically. Thre has been not even once that I heard any assyrian being discriminated by an armenian. And as for Kurds, I signed a petition to turkey to release Ojalan myself, when I noticed that campagn a few years ago.

I cannot accept your envy in any way! I suggest to work together to achieve justice in life and for wikipedia, to bring the truth to the readers. Aregakn (talk) 22:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look and see what I mean [3] Aregakn (talk) 06:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the message but I don't know the language to translate it into English. Can you clarify how I can help you? Aregakn (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add in the english article of "yavuz sultan selim", a turkish sultan, that he was also a racist, 'cause he did write a poeme toward kurds which is very racist, so i began to to translate the text from turkish to english, but i am sure that there are some mistakes, so i was asking myself whether you can help me to correct the translation?! --Alsace38 (talk) 11:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, OK. I will correct the mistakes in English but I cannot assure, that the translation is correct. You'll have to look into it, OK?

And keep your eye on the article Turkey. SOmebody tries their best to delete the infos about Kurds there. I have reverted the last one, but there's a Turkish nationalist that comes all over and his targets are usually the genocides and the minorities in Turkey (the info about them). Aregakn (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I have translated the first 3 sentenses of the poem, as I more or less understood the meaning of them:

"Oh Lord, do not give opportunity to a Kurd (“Kurd” as a collective word) to be sovereign ever in eternity,

Let him be in tight sabots (from rigid leather) on his feet, so that he shall never have Salvation.

Strike with a crook-staff, take the bread from him so, that even his stomach should never be full."

Have a look if it's good.

But the last sentense you wrote is not clear to me enough. Can you explain what it wants to say? I understand it says, that Kurds are pagan (I think he meant Yezidis, because Kurds are Muslim) and that the author wants them not to drink or be in some "fountain". Can you clarify the meaning so I can edit a bit? Thanks. Aregakn (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Iranian peoples, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bulgarian, English and Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'ogin, fire 'davam:to give

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dersim Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Seyid Riza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kurdish

Tunceli Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kurdish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ergative–absolutive language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://diachronica.pagesperso-orange.fr/TMCJ_vol_2.1_Fournet_Kassite.pdf

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gürpınar (District), Van (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kurdish

Hasköy, Muş (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kurdish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your table Kurmanci, Dimliki, Lazuri and Turkish comparison.

I saw some mistakes in it and wanted to give some input.

Kurmanci for "fire" is "Agir" It is allot more frequent in Kurmanci to use "ard" or sometimes "ax" for "Toprak". Also standard for the word "green" in Kurmanci is "Kesk". Like you probably might have heard "kesk u zur u zer" which means green, red and yellow.

regards Wikisupporting (talk) 03:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My dear all the words in this table are right and I did give all sources for each one. According to me Kurdish is very to sumerian or other mesopotamian tongs...--Alsace38 (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alsace38. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alsace38. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]