User talk:91.234.72.200

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 18:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying, you may be blocked from editing. UEFA and FIFA recognise Russia as the successor of the Soviet Union, and the Czech Republic as the successor of Czechoslovakia. Please discuss before introducing false information. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 20:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

I see that the first thing you've done after being unblocked is revert back the same thing again. Please stop and discuss, it's getting tiresome, and you'll just get yourself blocked for longer. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV. IP is clearly not here to be constructive. Govvy (talk) 16:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I believe that it is a mistake to point out that the national team of the Russian Federation is the only former member of the USSR. It's a lie. No confirmation by official documents. Ukraine has exactly the same right to the property of the USSR. Look at the page of the Ukrainian national football team! So stop contributing false information to Wikipedia!

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ashleyyoursmile! 17:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hey! I believe that it is a mistake to point out that the national team of the Russian Federation is the only former member of the USSR. It's a lie. No confirmation by official documents. Ukraine has exactly the same right to the property of the USSR. Look at the page of the Ukrainian national football team! So stop contributing false information to Wikipedia!

FIFA count Russia as the sole successors to USSR. Therefore, it's not "false information", it's reliably sourced information. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"FIFA count Russia as the sole successors to USSR." This statement is false. You cannot cite any official FIFA document. Stop propagating fake! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.234.72.200 (talk)

[1]- FIFA count 2006 as Ukraine's WC debut. No mention of USSR there. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The debut of Ukraine as an independent state really took place in the final part of the 2006 World Cup. Before that, Ukraine took part in qualifying for the 1998 and 2002 World Cups. That is, you are manipulating. I said that there is no FIFA document stating that Russia is the legal successor of the USSR. You did not react to this statement in any way. It turns out that I'm right. You have no arguments. This behavior of yours confirms your fake. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_national_football_team — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.234.72.200 (talk)

FIFA World Cup debut: 2006, like I wrote before. No mentioned of the USSR. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FIFA document stating that Russia is the legal successor of the USSR, like I wrote before. You are spreading fakes on Wikipedia.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This includes Ukraine/Russia. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Luk ^talk 18:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.