User talk:185.172.241.184

Hi, please save the effort. These files are already tagged with {{Now Commons}}. They will be reviewed and dealt with when admins are ready, there is no need to rush the process. ✗plicit 14:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to File:Fred the Oyster sound effect.ogg, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to File:Casa Poporului.jpg—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Topican (talk) 15:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Some of your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. _signed, Willondon (talk) 16:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at File:CNN+ (logo).svg, you may be blocked from editing. —Locke Cole • t • c 07:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to File:40-29 ABC KHBS KHOG.png, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at File:Antonio Asensio.jpg. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you have removed File:James Westerfield on The Andy Griffith Show c. 1964.jpg from James Westerfield, but you probably shouldn't have done that. The file was almost certainly going to end up deleted either on January 21 or January 22 per WP:F7 which is much faster than it would end up being deleted per WP:F5; moreover, all some one needs to do to de-orphan the file is to simply re-add it some article. F5 deletions are WP:SOFTDELETIONs and considered for the most routine housekeeping so to speak and non-free files deleted per F5 qualify for undeletion via WP:REFUND . F7 deletions, however, mean the file is being deleted for much stronger reasons and thus getting them restored is not as simple and usually require a WP:DRV. I'm sure you you were just try to help, but you've actually made things a bit more complicated. File tagged for speedy deletion per F7 probably should be left alone until an administrator reviews them; removing them from articles to try and get them de facto deleted as "orphaned non-free use" can be seen as an attempt to try and have a file deleted without giving anyone a chance to discuss or dispute the deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Gwyneth Paltrow. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't remove keep local tags under any circumstances.

If you feel the reason for them is poor or no longer applies, then please nominate them for deletion through WP:FFD. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hi. Please don't remove the text of the page when marking something as NowCommons.

Also, please don't restore a NowCommons tag that has been declined. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aviram7. An edit you recently made to File:Manila City Hall clock tower alt (Padre Burgos Avenue, Manila; 06-24-2023).jpg seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 15:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at File:Catholic Elementary School, Melaka logo.png. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 05:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:Paliam Palace.jpg. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 13:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.172.241.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't vandalize Wikipedia, I mark redundant files. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 08:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for disruptive editing, which you clearly were. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.