User talk:俠刀行

The article 1pondo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC) User tasl[reply]

• Right, no source. If you can find reliable independent sources showing this company's notability per WP:CORP, feel free to repost. If you do, please don't use slang sexual terms as you did in your first article. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

我不小心把其他维基注册的帐号用在这里了，如何删除呢？在这里--俠刀行 (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

根据我了解，无法删除维基用户帐号；你就干脆不用那个帐号 行。将来，如果某人想要用“Monsiuer et café”的帐号，他可以usurp (zh:维基百科:更改用戶名/帳戶易手) 那个帐号。 rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor. Thank you for your interest in English Wikipedia. New users are always welcome.

However, your current knowledge of the English language is - as you say - at such a basic level that is difficult to see how you could work here.

Your request today to User talk:RadioFan shows the problem. From what is understandable, it reads like a demand! I'm sure you didn't mean it to but this is the sort of problem that would happen many times and could make things frustrating for you if your meanings cannot be understood clearly.

Help with editing Wikipedia is always available and RadioFan would be pleased to help. But help with basic English is outside the scope of the project. Put simply, the amount of help you need is so great that it would be impossible to give it.

Why not start an account over at the Simple English Wikipedia [1] ? I think you would like it there and would get the help you need.

Best wishes Plutonium27 (talk) 17:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• When your English has improved, you'll find it much easier and more enjoyable here. There's no need for all this "I'll never come back" drama, really. Nor do you need to close your page - just put a note saying you're taking a long break and maybe come back sometimes to do little edits that you are sure of and meanwhile, practice your English where you can get more help. Plutonium27 (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on content, not on contributors. Please keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi fellow Wikipedian,
My communication is about the globalization template that you added (on March 09, 2010) to the article for the Battle of Frenchman's Creek.
The template says, "The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with North America and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject".
I would have thought it obvious that an article about a military engagement that took place in North America would deal with the subject primarily in a North American context. This was a small-scale battle in the War of 1812 and one that had no strategic consequences whatever. The article clearly states that the incident was part of the War of 1812 and the user has the opportunity to click on the War of 1812 in order to find out all about that conflict and its wider international context.
What sort of "worldwide view" are you asking for here? What sort of "examples and perspective" would you regard as being more appropriate?
It is all very well adding a template saying that the article has an insufficiently global persepective: but unless you explain what you mean by this in real terms, i.e. by giving examples of what is wrong and (ideally) suggestions of how they could be put right, then there is nothing that anyone can do to help the situation.
Best wishes,
Flonto (talk) 12:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

• 中文：意思有看没有懂，似乎鸭子听雷。反正我大致的理解是，这篇文章我只有看到美国军队战斗的部分。英军的部属还有进攻路线等等，好像没找到，似乎需要更多的资料。--俠刀行 (talk) 12:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• 日本語：意味は少し分からない。あの文章はアメリカ軍のインフォメーションだけあるから、英国軍のがいらない。色々な情報が欲しいと思います。--俠刀行 (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

他基本的意思就是，因为这场战役是在北美洲发生的，而且是场没有影响过其他地方的小战役，那么除了北美洲视角以外没有什么相关的视角。他是问你你想要什么样的“国际视角”。 rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi fellow Wikipedian. I am sorry but I am not able to read the reply that you have written to my query concerning the Battle of Frenchman's Creek globalization template. What you have typed (and also what Rjanag has typed) appear to me simply as a series of white squares. Is this perhaps because of the browser that I am using? So I still do not know what kind of changes you desire in the article.
Regards, Flonto (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Enhlish: Sorry for replying late, I've looked for the dictionary to know your meaning. I guess that The view of that battle lacks something important. That is mean by(to say), it writes only about American armies and so forth. I didn't see the invading plan for the British army.

On the other hand, I'm not good at English. I'll get confused if you use a harder grammar. The point is...my level of English is en-0.--俠刀行 (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Battle of Frenchman's Creek in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Miranda1989 (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• English: Hi,dear wikipedian. I finally saw your message at right here. But the article still has the problem of globalization. Attention: please do not remove the globalization template. My friend Rjanag will explain everything about my idea (I've asked him for translation). Please be more patient and do not remove the template again. Thank you, guy.--俠刀行 (talk) 04:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi fellow Wikipedian,
I have looked into what you said about there being insufficient information in the article from the British side. At first, I thought that nothing could usefully be added because the general strategic situation was adequately covered in other articles and because this article was about a surprise invasion of Canada by the Americans that the British could not make any plans regarding. On closer inspection, however, I determined that in fact more information would be helpful to the reader.
I have made two additions in this respect. Firstly, I have added to the ‘Background’ section a paragraph explaining that the British supreme commander in North America had forbidden his subordinates to engage in any attacks on the Niagara Frontier and so all that they could do in this area was distribute their troops to try to guard the border. Secondly, I have added a paragraph to the end of the ‘Aftermath’ section, which describes the British reaction to the incident. Because so little attention was paid to the incident by the British and Canadians, very little about their viewpoint seems to have been recorded. Most books about the War of 1812 skim over the events in the article without going into detail. As a consequence of this, my version had to be pieced together mostly from original documents published in Ernest Cruikshank’s Documentary History (cited in the ‘Bibliography’ section).
Please take a look at those changes (whenever you have time – there is no hurry) and, if you still think that improvements are needed, describe what you think is still required on Talk:Battle of Frenchman's Creek. It is important that you write your suggestions, not on your own talk page, but on the talk page for the article where they can be seen by any Wikipedia user who is interested in improving the article.
Best wishes, Flonto (talk) 11:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

这是什么东西？专门检测真钞或伪钞的机器吗？--俠刀行 (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

好像是。rʨanaɢ (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image source, I'll upload it to the article. Spellcast (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. Reasons are complex, but I will be here at En-wiki and keep provide my contribution. It is actually no loss for either me or zh-wiki due to my leave. --Walter Grassroot |talk 23:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

--俠刀行 (talk) 16:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear somebody, I cannot get it that what types of Simple English, English wikipedia are. They're all English so that I have no idea. Another question is, Can I write something and put it on English wikipedia by Simple English? Is that possible?--俠刀行 (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wikipedia以简单英语为主。主要是给母语非英语读者提供的。见zh:简易英语维基百科。rʨanaɢ (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Battle of Canton (1857), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 12:22, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 俠刀行!

I declined the speedy deletion of Battle of Canton (1857). Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Regards, decltype (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请阅读我们英语维基百科有关删除条目的方针： Wikipedia:Deletion policy。我们不会因为条目短而给他删除。

此外，你如果不愿意用英语跟这边的用户交流，你最好不要在这里编辑。 rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should withdraw your nomination and think carefully before nominating another article. Fences&Windows 20:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

请撤销删除操作提名。请不要提名的另一篇文章。你不明白我们的政策。如果您不能说英语，不要尝试写英语维基百科的文章，或删除英语维基百科的文章。 (谷歌翻译: Please withdraw your deletion nomination. Please do not nominate another article. You do not understand our policies. If you cannot speak English, do not try to write English Wikipedia articles or to delete English Wikipedia articles). Fences&Windows 20:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't believe you when you say you cannot understand what I wrote. You have been writing and understanding English fine in the deletion discussion and on talk pages. Quit playing around. Fences&Windows 20:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

我最信赖的朋友，帮我问User:ContinentalAve为什麽把北京(Beijing)全部转换成北平(Beiping)？这样子不懂中日战争的老外会搞成北平和北京是不同城市。帮我好好问他一下，感谢。--俠刀行 (talk) 00:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

大概是因为当时的北京叫北平。这已经在此条目写得比较清楚："fought in the proximity of Beiping (now Beijing)". rʨanaɢ (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See [2] -- Terraflorin (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

check here: ro:Bătălia de la Canton (1857) --(Terraflorin (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)).[reply]