Template talk:Infobox organization

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Infoboxes This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles Organizations This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles

Template:Infobox organization is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 31 August 2021, see discussion. Merge, 2018 November 25, see discussion. Older deletion discussions: No consensus, 2018 April 24, see discussion. No consensus, 2017 September 30, see discussion. Keep, 2017 September 6, see discussion. No consensus to merge, 2014 December 19, see discussion.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

I see that someone has apparently unilaterally removed the motto parameter, after we had an RfC (see most recent archive page) that did not come to a consensus from that result, and some spotty follow-on discussion indicating that earlier removal of mission and slogan parameters was engendered by a tiny handful of inexperienced editors most of whom are blocked or otherwise gone. So where exactly is the consensus discussion that concluded to remove |motto=? If there wasn't one, then it should be restored immediately, and the removal of it from article in the interim should stop until this matter is settled.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SMcCandlishI did not see this until after the removal was complete. There were at least three of us involved in the removal (which had gotten about half way through the alphabet when I started helping). I'm not sure where the decision was to have Motto placed in a halfway state, where it isn't displayed but is kept.

I agree with WP:MISSION and the removal from Infoboxes seems to fit that quite well. If Mission/Slogan is to be kept, I'd appreciate a formal proposal to add it back into what is displayed. In general, I believe that the Category:Infoboxes with unknown parameters subcats represent parameters that can be deleted, or in individual cases moved to a free_label, but in most cases, deleted. I've held off on cleaning Category:Pages using infobox organization with unknown parameters for which Mission represents about 1/3 of the pages (just above 800 out of about 2500).Naraht (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht: I think you meant to link to the categories and not categorize this page itself, so I placed the ":" at those 2 spots within your comment, assume you do not mind. Zaathras (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zaathras Thank you. My apologies.Naraht (talk) 23:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this too, and I'm not convinced that this change has adequate consensus, nor that there is now some sort of shift whereby editors who want to go back have suddenly become the ones who have to establish a new consensus. I do think there are some cases where the slogan is not just empty verbiage. On the other hand, there is always the simple workaround of putting the slogan, with sourcing, into the text, where appropriate. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning this category up, looks like mission is the single largest.Naraht (talk) 03:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While editing Critical Path Institute I stumbled upon a |leader_title that was not updated since years. I think it would make sense to add a parameter such as |leader_asof where the date of last update could be indicated. This way, readers would be informed if the information could be obsolete. This could be done for all information that are subject to change. What do you think? Broc (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please add an item for sound logo, for example, sound logo of Wikimedia, which is:

Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 06:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hooman Mallahzadeh Can you please give a measure of how common it is for organizations to have this?Naraht (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht No, I can't prove how common it is. But I'm somehow sure that it is very important to note that in Infoboxes. Read Sound trademark please. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 15:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]