Template talk:Home and Away

	Australia Template‑class
Home and Away is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Soap Operas Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Television Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I was just wondering if it was about time that this template was split into two; one for the characters and one for the related articles (lists, music, awards, etc)? I think Home and Away's the only soap that I know of that still has one template and despite my initial reservations about the Neighbours one being split, I've grown to love the format. - JuneGloom Talk 21:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should. Some Uniformity would be nice. Conquistador2k6 5 March 2013 22:29 (UTC)

I have been waiting for this moment. Lets make this happen. I have thought about when the best time to make the change would be. I think now is a good time. Totally my favourite suggestion on here of 2013.Rain the 1 22:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think we kept it as it is because we had fewer articles. There weren't many past characters with their own pages and there was like two yearly lists. - JuneGloom Talk 22:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done/ Only listed those with their own pages in Past characters. Adding now to every spare article going. Conquistador2k6 6 March 2013 23:50 (UTC)

That was a bit fast. I was gonna wait for Skteosk to comment. - JuneGloom Talk 23:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't gone out yet. It's in the navboxes category though and I may as well fix up the original template first. Conquistador2k6 7 March 2013 00:01 (UTC