Talk:Zygmunt Bauman

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Ethics Social and political philosophy Contemporary philosophy Poland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Zygmunt Bauman (born 19 November 1925 in Poznań - died 02 Febraury 2010 in Edinburgh) is a Polish sociologist who, since 1971, has resided in England after leaving Poland in 1968. He lost the tenure in Warsaw University due to anti-Semitic campaign carried out by the ruling communist party(PZPR)which he was a member. After that he and his wife decided to emigrate." ^[1] Quote from his first biography cited in ref.: "The wife replied: «Do you realize what you are saying? I understand that you have noble intentions but do you imagine that you will have to hide Jewish children again? Here in Warsaw? ». That evening we decided to emigrate from Poland."

Somnambulik44 (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where to start with this introduction. Not only are there the obvious citation question for a start, but this information should probably not be in the introduction in any case. I would edit it myself, however, I don't know if this information is true (in which case is should go in the description somewhere) or just some hyperbole. Washboardplayer (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations are never a bad idea, although in this case what you're asking about is common knowledge. Whether or not this biographical information needs to be in the introduction, is another matter. I tend to say it's dispensable, but as it clarifies the tricky issue of Polish-Jewish-British identity, there may be a case for it. (By the way, if I recall this correctly, he also had an offer to teach in Canberra, so he may have ended up being Polish-Jewish-Australian instead. ;))--Thorsten1 (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Zygmunt Bauman is a British sociologist of Polish-Jewish descent" is misleading, since it suggests that his "main" nationality was British and only some of his distant relatives were Polish or Jewish, which is obviously not true. He is a "British" sociologist only in the same way as Einstein was an "American" sciencist or Alfred Tarski an "American" logician. I think that "Polish sociologist of Jewish descent" would be much better, because it is already contained in the article that he worked mainly in the UK. --83.26.81.60 11:46, 4 August 2005 [signature added, --Thorsten1 11:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)][reply]

This is a tricky issue indeed, and I thought about it quite long when I was creating the stub. In the end, I settled for "British" as the main attribute, because Bauman first came to worldwide attention as a British author and is not generally noted for his Polish output - unlike Einstein, who already was a global celebrity when he settled in the USA. Also, Bauman seems to have made a home in the UK, much more than Einstein ever did in the USA: He never accepted any of the prestigious positions offered to him by American universities, neither did he return to Poland.

The label "Jewish" is another problematic issue. To the best of my knowledge, neither is Bauman a practising Jew, nor were his parents; and had it not been for the "anti-Zionist" campaign against inconvenient intellectuals in 1968, his Jewish background may never have gotten much attention. He never wrote about "Jewish" topics, either, before "Modernity and the Holocaust" - which he wrote with the declared goal of removing the Jewish aura from the topic.

This shows that Bauman, doing his own writings credit, defies easy ethnic categorisation. My description in the first sentence is probably not the worst, but not the best, either. So feel free to try out other versions to your heart's content. Anyhow, thanks for bringing this article back to my attention...

On a formal note, please sign your contributions on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~) to insert a signature and an automatic timestamp. This is helpful even if you are not a logged in user. --Thorsten1 11:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

" inconvenient intellectuals in 1968, his Jewish background may never have gotten much attention. He never wrote about "Jewish" topics, either, before "Modernity and the Holocaust" - which he wrote with the declared goal of removing the Jewish aura from the topic."

I am afraid Thorsten that his jewish background did receive attention both from him and his friends in Stalinist times before 1968 http://abcnet.com.pl/pl/artykul_zas.php?art_id=112&w=p&token= Molobo

No need to be afraid, Molobo. When I said that his Jewish background didn't get much attention I was obviously talking about the scholarly reception from fellow sociologists and the general public, and not about his friends or his wife, a Warsaw Ghetto survivor. But even so, if you'd care to actually read the source you cite, you might discover that it supports my argument rather than yours. Take the following sentence, for example: "Od czasu rozpoczęcia się kampanii antysemickiej coś się zmieniło w moim widzeniu ludzi. Dawniej rozróżniałam znajomych i przyjaciół według cech charakteru, poziomu intelektu, walorów towarzyskich. Jedni byli mądrzejsi, inni mniej mądrzy, jedni nieco nudnawi, inni dowcipni. Byli zdolni i niezbyt zdolni, zadowoleni z życia i ponuracy. Teraz zmieniło się nagle główne kryterium podziału. Jak za okupacji, byli Polacy "czystej krwi" i byli Żydzi." ("After the beginning of the anti-Semitic campaign, something changed in my perception of people. Before, I had categorised acquaintances and friends according to their character, intellectual level and social skills. Some were wiser, some less so; some were a bit dull, others were witty. There were talented and less talented ones, some were happy with their lives, others were morose. Now, the main criterion suddenly changed. Just like under the [German] occupation, there were 'pure-blooded' Poles and there were Jews.") This clearly shows that even for Janina Bauman, the Holocaust survivor, their Jewish ethnicity was not an important issue before the onset of anti-Semitic purges. --Thorsten1 22:29, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you would read the link, you would see that it was even before power conflict in 1968:

Uzasadnieniem nagłej dymisji było podejrzane zachowanie jego ojca - rzekomo utrzymywał kontakty z ambasadą izraelską.

Zdesperowany Zygmunt pobiegł natychmiast do ojca i zażądał wyjaśnień. Ojciec nie myślał zaprzeczać: rzeczywiście był dwukrotnie w ambasadzie, żeby dowiedzieć się o możliwości emigracji. To był dla Zygmunta drugi tego dnia cios. Nie godził się z syjonizmem, bolało go, że ojciec myśli o emigracji do Izraela, a także - może najbardziej - to, że mu nigdy o tym nie powiedział. Dotknięty do żywego, wypomniał to ojcu w ostrych słowach, po czym przestał się do niego odzywać. [...]

So as you see his Jewish background played a role in his life before 1968 --Molobo 19:51, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First off, if you quote Polish sources, you might want to include a translation for the benefit of non-Polish speaking Wikipedians. So here's an English version: "His sudden discharge was justified with his father's suspicious behaviour - allegedly, he had contacts with the Israeli embassy. Desperate, Zygmunt immediately ran to his father und demanded an explanation. His father did not even think about denying: In fact, he had been to the embassy twice to ask about the possibility of emigration. This was the second blow for Zygmunt that day. He was against Zionism, it hurt him that his father thought of emigrating to Israel, and - maybe most of all - that he had never told him about it. [...]"

"If you would read the link, [...]". You see, I happen to own the book the excerpt is from, and in fact I have read it. My judgment of things does not generally hinge on random Google finds. However, I fail to see what it is that you want to demonstrate with the anecdote above. If anything, it just proves my point, namely that Bauman himself did not attach much importance to his Jewish background. "as you see his Jewish background played a role in his life before 1968". Certainly, but then nobody implied otherwise. His superior officers' opinions about his father are, in my view, rather immaterial to the article, though. My point was that his Jewish identity did not play any significant role in his scholarly work and reception, both in Poland and internationally. I don't see anything in your posts that would disprove this, neither do I see any point in trying. ---Thorsten1 18:52, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thorsten could you expand info on him in that period ? Wasn't he attending a marxists course in Moscow  ? Guardian says he was a Red Army officer at the time.He also served in counterintelligence(that fought opposition to communist rule) in Stalinist Poland IIRC. --Molobo 14:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC) He also educated the later dictator of Poland Wojciech Jaruzelski--Molobo 14:14, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Molobo, rest assured that I will expand on this (and more) as soon as I finally find some time for it. But please do not expect me to reveal (or accept) that Bauman, as Jaruzelski's one-time instructor, was the mastermind behind martial law in Poland... ;) --Thorsten1 22:29, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply interested why Guardian lists him as Red Army officer, what was his rank and where did he served and what was his role in establishing communist regime in Poland --Molobo 19:51, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. My reply to the above has been repeatedly deleted by Molobo, who claimed that it constitutes a "personal attack". I restored my post and asked him not to delete other people's posts, but to file a proper arbitration case against me if he felt offended. Instead, he chose to delete this, too, this time claiming that I had commented on his "personal life"; shortly afterwards, he denounced me as saying that he, Molobo, was "worst then [sic] communist propaganda". I left a note on his talk page, in which I asked him once again to either formally complain about me, or to stop deleting my posts and denouncing me by misrepresenting my statements. As was to be expected, he deleted this note, too, again claiming that I was talking about his "personal life or person".

I agree with Molobo on one point, namely that this issue is irrelevant to the article Zygmunt Bauman - this was, in fact, my very own argument in first of my three posts deleted by Molobo. That is why I refuse to take part in time-consuming infantile reverting games, and will not restore my previous posts this time. For the record, they remain available in the revision history. If anyone cares enough (which I doubt) they can check my reply to the above and judge for themselves whether or not I am guilty of any personal attacks against Molobo. Of course, I remain prepared to answer for anything I wrote. --Thorsten1 19:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zygmunt Bauman, according to his wife published memories, was expelled from the army because his father applied for a visa to go to Israel. What it means that his father was not a “ practicing Jew”.

Bauman went from Poland to Israel were he lived four years.

Many of Bauman’s writing before Modernity and Holocaust refers to the modern Jewish condition. In a great extend his first elaboration on modernity and the fear of ambiguity have the Jewish condition as the main empirical source.

I'm just wondering if, in light of Zygmunt Bauman's own discussion on Identity in the book, whether it is right to include such a clear national identity for him in the page. He discusses at length his own deliberations about his identity and concludes that he will not disclose fully his beliefs about it, and that it is almost of minor importance - so maybe the opening to the article should reflect this and refer more he his identity as a sociologist, and if need be to his sociology being in the british tradition?

Acidsaturation 14:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To expand with this new information about his role in Communist Security Service.[1]--Molobo 13:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Ozon magazine made a claim based upon information that it said was obtained from the IPN, which has access to the archives of the Polish communist security services. Until IPN publishes its findings, Ozon's allegation can not be treated as anything more than a claim. Well they published clear pictures of his documents in Security service and Bauman acknowledged that information as true. --Molobo 14:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In interviews Bauman has said he gives little detail of his own life, because it would be from such a biased perspective. 82.21.150.24 00:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Best in 'Zygmunt Bauman: Why Good People Do Bad Things' (2013, Ashgate) explores Bauman's biography and the links between his life and work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.64.99 (talk) 11:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the section on Bauman's actual work and theories, becuase I thought they were rather under-elaborated relative the pretty comprehensive biography. I've attempted to get all the most important bits in there, and given his 'postmodernism' a separate little section because it's become a bit of a bogey word of late.

Feel free to chop and change.

No explicit treatment of Bauman's extensive work on the 'liquid' aspects of modernity in the economy, career, and relationships? How can this be?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.41.7.94 (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's written like it was taken directly out of some random book by some random post modern author. What I mean to say is: it's written in an unnecessaraly complicated way. I find it tough to read that, specially considering english is not my mother language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.8.99.126 (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the above criticism (which, frankly, was quite justified - and I think I must take the blame for some of it!) I've tried to re-write Bauman's 'work' section more clearly and chronologically. I've still got what I replaced saved if anyone's got problems with the new version. The new bit doesn't talk at all about Bauman's moral theory as the old on did, so I may try to add a section on that (it's one of the more complex aspects of his thought, so it might get a bit technical). There probably needs to be a bit more on consumerism too, which I'll endeavor to add.

PS. Re. The whole 'Bauman in the secret police' controversy: is it necessary to have such lengthy references to it? It all seems rather nebulous to me, but maybe I'm wrong... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.124.65 (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does he have to say, as a Marxist Socialist, about the collapse of Communism that occurred twenty years ago?Lestrade (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Bauman has written extensively on the nature of socialism/communism and its collapse throughout his work. One of the essays devoted exclusively to this topic is "Communism: a postmortem" in Intimations of Postmodernity (1992). Please read up on it and add what you find useful. Don't ask what Wikipedia can do for you, but what you can do for Wikipedia! ;) --Thorsten1 (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the publisher Demos, the publication date of "Alone Again - Ethics After Certainty" is 1994-01-01 and not 1996. --Baolog (talk) 19:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or whatever, per this Haaretz article: Polish-Jewish sociologist compares West Bank separation fence to Warsaw Ghetto walls. FYI CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's controversial about that? Common sense and stating the obvious. 199.127.253.168 (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently a recent vandal disagreed. :-( CarolMooreDC (talk) 03:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a strong feeling about whether or not to include them. But I do know it is inappropriate to make bigoted sounding statements in edit summaries and would encourage people to refrain since that is against wikipedia policy. Polite discussion of the topic can happen here. CarolMooreDC 18:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

should you not write somthing that he influnced or used as some of the big emeperic proven writer abut globalzation ? like Saskia Sassen ,manuel castells (linkes to the writes abut secondar lirturae abut this guy?)becuse they take his ideas and prove them whit data and make it less like a a books abut ideas more abut prove facts maybe link to sobody that have the oposit wiews ? (beck ?transhumansim?)becuse he is a very evrything new is bad kind of thinker and dont have many soutiolion i mean look at poltical sections in wikipedia they linkj to foks that have difrent wiews of the topic 82.147.33.187 (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)murakami[reply]

For WPPOLAND: failed. Reason: quick fail due to insufficient density of inline references, numerous unreferenced paragraphs. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Best, Shaun (2013) Zygmunt Bauman: Why Good People Do Bad Things, Farnham, Ashgate Shaun Best (talk) 11:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. If you have future requests like this, please provide all the details required for the book in question. I had to go hunt for the ISBN. --Stfg (talk) 12:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting that Bauman was a "collaborator" as early as "1939-1941", i.e. at a time when he was 14 to 16 years (just)... I mean, the least you could expect from Polish Jewish children who just made it out of the country before the Germans got hold of them, would be joining the resistance movement in the country that effectively saved their lives, right? Certainly simply going to school there constitutes a despicable act of "collaboration". But maybe Bauman is much older and did not only "lie about his age to work longer and secure a pension", as Dr Shaun Best of Manchester University subtly implies, but also to cover up his role as one of Stalin's toughest "collaborators"... Then again, that label may tell us more about whoever put there than about Bauman, but who am I to decide? --Thorsten1 (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding publication location.

From the article-

1988: Freedom. Philadelphia: Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-15592-8

Open University Press as of 2001 was published in Philadelphia PA US and Buckingham UK. Before being acquired in 2002 by McGraw Hill Financial.

I have seen this book as being published in Milton Keynes though.Jonpatterns (talk) 13:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is the role of David Lehmann? Something perished.Xx236 (talk) 06:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.academia.edu/15031047/Problematic_Elements_in_the_Scholarship_of_Zygmunt_Bauman Xx236 (talk) 07:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original critics. The page quotes a Polish language blog instead. Xx236 (talk) 09:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nach dreijährigem Aufenthalt in Israel siedelte die Familie 1971 nach Großbritannien über. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.41.3.21 (talk) 10:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Zygmunt Bauman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130829041905/http://ipn.gov.pl:80/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/47281/1-7151.pdf to http://ipn.gov.pl/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/47281/1-7151.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531174332/http://www.fpa.es/en/press/news/alain-touraine-and-zygmunt-bauman-prince-of-asturias-award-for-communication-and-humanities/ to http://www.fpa.es/en/press/news/alain-touraine-and-zygmunt-bauman-prince-of-asturias-award-for-communication-and-humanities/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423104452/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/sociology/people/baumanbibliog.htm to http://www.gold.ac.uk/media/documents-by-section/departments/research-centres-and-units/research-centres/centre-for-urban-and-comm/city.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423104452/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/sociology/people/baumanbibliog.htm to http://www.culturaacademica.com.br/catalogo-detalhe.asp?ctl_id=380
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423104452/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/sociology/people/baumanbibliog.htm to http://www.sociology.leeds.ac.uk/bauman/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090429094812/http://www.demos.co.uk:80/publications/aloneagain to http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/aloneagain
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.occupiedlondon.org/bauman
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111007120520/http://www.barcelonametropolis.cat/en/page.asp?id=22&ui=407 to http://www.barcelonametropolis.cat/en/page.asp?id=22&ui=407

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The are no sources that indicate a anti-semitic campaign. Just because many internal critics of the regime where Jewish, does not make them anti-communist, so expelling Jewish critics does not in turn make the authorities automatically anti-semitic! Get it. So if no sources, no valid claim.IBestEditor (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1968 Polish political crisis - both political and anti-semitic.Xx236 (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zygmunt Bauman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090703231933/http://www.salon.eu.sk/article.php?article=1102-inhumanity-is-part-of-human-nature to http://www.salon.eu.sk/article.php?article=1102-inhumanity-is-part-of-human-nature
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423104452/http://www.leeds.ac.uk/sociology/people/baumanbibliog.htm to http://sociology.leeds.ac.uk/blogs/zbi/author/Janzygbauaolcom/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.academia.edu/15031047/Problematic_Elements_in_the_Scholarship_of_Zygmunt_Bauman Xx236 (talk) 12:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Xx236! Zygmunt Bauman, "one of the most productive, most read, and most discussed sociologists in the world" Problematic Elements in the Scholarship of Zygmunt Bauman p. 1 plagiarized a huge 300 word chunk straight from Wikipedia!

"In an extended passage on pages 34-36 of Richness, Bauman highlights the problematic consequences of economic growth, and presents quotations from John Stuart Mill and John Maynard Keynes to support his argument. The passage is almost identical to a section of text in the Wikipedia article “Steady state economy” (which has existed in that form on the website of the online encyclopaedia since 18 August 2009). Again, Bauman provides no proper citation, and appears to make no attempt to paraphrase the text of the Wikipedia article. The passage is over 300 words long, and reproduces from the Wikipedia article four quotations, in the same order, with the same citations–along with the same errors in the quotations and citations..." ibid p.9

I was just trying to find out more regarding the Neri Oxman case of Wikiipedia plagiarism, and stumbled upon this. It seems like EVERYONE plagiarizes, and from Wikipedia no less. Yet *YOU* were astute enough to notice years ago, and wrote about it accordingly, somewhere above on this talk page. Sigh, adding something about this to the article is so far from my knowledge domain, I don't know if I should.--FeralOink (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, the article does mention it, but quotes a pro-Zygmunt point of view, suggesting that to criticize him is "despicable" even though he really did plagiarize from wikipedia as well as from the website of an obscure college, Trinity University, in San Antonio, Texas.--FeralOink (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Book Review: Of God and Man by Zygmunt Bauman and Stanislaw Obirek Bauman and Obirek explore their differences as well as their separate paths to agnosticism. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2015/12/11/book-review-of-god-and-man-by-zygmunt-bauman-and-stanislaw-obirek/ ReinoLeino (talk) 04:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]