Talk:Westminster Larger Catechism

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Would this not be Wikisource? -- user:zanimum

No :)

Seriously, this definitely doesn't belong in Wikipedia, it might be suitable for Wikisource. --Robert Merkel 12:30, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

First time I've heard of Wikisource! I'm checking it as I type... I suppose it probably is a borderline Wikisource, except that it is not as long as the ones I've just scanned. I just thought that it would be good to have the actual source material in the encyclopaedia entry. I've done the same with Westminster Shorter Catechism and Thirty-Nine Articles. What is the policy with this? One Salient Oversight 12:37, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Robert M has deleted most of the article. Oh well. Should I also delete the primary source material in the Shorter Catechism and the 39 articles RObert? One Salient Oversight 12:49, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Wikipedia:don't include copies of primary sources. However, it would be really good if you could add to the Wikipedia articles explaining what these documents are, how they were written, how they have influenced things since, and so on.

--Robert Merkel 12:53, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks for your help Robert. One Salient Oversight 12:55, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

So has it been included on Wikisource? -- user:zanimum

I just added it to Wikisource. -- Rich Blinne 30 November 2004, 20:53 (UTC)