Talk:Supply chain management

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Topics addressed by selected professional supply chain certification programmes[edit]

Article has a note from October 2017 proposing a split for the material on professional supply chain certification programmes. The proposal discussion is archived with no discussion other that the split proposal by Biogeographist. I agree that the table seems too large and specific for this article and support the proposed split, but I would call the article "Supply chain certification programmes" without the reference to "comparisons". - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree TolWol56 (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Biogeographist, BobKilcoyne, and TolWol56: I'd be happy to help effect the split, given that it seems to have consensus. However, the current section "Organisation", which would presumably form the basis of the new page, seems to be based entirely on a single 2009 book on the topic, which would be a little thin for a standalone article. Do any of you have some sources which could be used to build the new page, or would even be able to sketch up a draft? Felix QW (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be some scholarly work on the topic, such as this, so I suspect notability is not an issue. Felix QW (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with my own split proposal: Actually, I would suggest just removing the {{split}} template and keeping the table in this article. I suggested the split so long ago that I don't even remember doing it, and I've changed my mind: now I think the table is not big enough for a separate article. However, I still agree with the formatting changes that I suggested. Thanks for drawing attention to this. Biogeographist (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the level of detail set out in the table still required? The terms "high" and "low" are not defined. What do they actually mean? The only reference cited in this section is Jacoby's 2009 Guide. Is all this detail cited in Jacoby? If so it is going to be out-of-date? Tramaricoa et al's analysis looking at preferences and relevance to SCM is a useful reference but does not list topics to the extent covered by this table. I would prefer to remove the table completely. BobKilcoyne (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ninamn7 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by OneGoodNut (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BL33701 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BL33701 (talk) 03:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]