Talk:Blythe Masters

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The 'Notoriety' section was quite obviously written by Pierre Jovanovic to promote his own original research on the subject (his self-published book, his blog...). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.252.108.67 (talk) 15:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

二尸姐Blythe·Masters,Stand by play some new finance bonds. Kindred007 (talk) 03:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

掉期交易给人的感觉像百幕三角期权,赖个姐姐Blythe·Masters的脸,教我玩转百幕三角期权perfect. Kindred007 (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blythe·Masters,Bitcoin Sister…… Kindred007 (talk) 08:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Sister,Blythe·Masters,happy new year. Kindred007 (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Blythe·Masters(My sister),I have many questions about u.

 Kindred007 (talk) 06:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

Draft:Digital Asset Holdings[edit]

For anyone interested, there is now a draft for Masters company: Draft:Digital Asset Holdings. Please feel free to edit. Cheers. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yale X-Max12.25? Kindred007 (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blythe Masters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the overly promotional edits[edit]

User:Tttfw made a bunch of changes a couple of days ago. Almost every single change makes the article sound overly promotional, and has removed most of the "negative" information. The changes are highly suspect, as the user hasn't contributed to any other changes at all. Can someone more experienced than me take a look at these changes and perhaps undo most/all of them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btcgeek (talkcontribs) 05:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so this seems to be a recurring theme with some new accounts trying to make this page less factual and more promotional. They are 'changing the facts' so to speak to make the person appear overly positive and put a PR spin on the article. I caught another account doing the same: Factchecker9. Same MO as Tttfw. Lots of edits, and all edits towards a marketing tilt. Account created less than 24 hours ago, and every single edit is for the same article. Btcgeek (talk) 23:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]