Talk:1925 in New Zealand

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Years Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Zealand Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

theres a lot of untrue spam content in this and related articles. why stop at 1925, what about back to Cook or Tasman, or Kupe. the articles creator has supported alleged non-spam views in the past, how come different rules exist for differnet users. we see the good intent, but it defies the generally accepted behaviour in this environment, that I have been exposed to. consensus would suggest that the pages are at least TRUE at time of creation. FFS!!! triple J hot 100? moza 03:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A big ups to Dramatic for fixxing this article, cool and good on ya mate.. now for the other 106 articles.moza 04:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1925 in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014052518/http://poisonpawn.co.nz/nzcftitles.htm to http://www.poisonpawn.co.nz/nzcftitles.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090617211531/http://www.hrnz.co.nz/data/major_races/major_race2.htm to http://www.hrnz.co.nz/data/major_races/major_race2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]