Draft talk:Pixpa

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconInternet Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCompanies Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Declaring an interest[edit]

I work in the Pixpa's Content Team and am declaring an interest in this page (COI - Declaring An Interest). I'm here to contribute information that will improve the quality of the Pixpa wiki page.

I am aware of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and I will abide by them. I will preview future changes on the talk page and solicit feedback before committing any.

If you want to contact me, please leave a message on my talk page, or e-mail me at frizel@pixpa.com Thank you!

4eyedpeas (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Reconsideration Request for Pixpa Wikipedia Article Submission[edit]

Dear Wikipedia Review Team,

I appreciate your feedback on my previous submission for a Wikipedia page dedicated to Pixpa. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s stringent guidelines for notability and independent, reliable sources. In light of your comments, I have gathered additional references that more robustly demonstrate Pixpa’s significance and notability within the photography website builder domain.

I would like to highlight the following points and sources:

In-Depth Coverage: The references provided offer comprehensive reviews and analyses of Pixpa’s features, usability, and impact in the field of photography website building. For instance:

1. PhotoWorkout’s review (link) offers a detailed examination of Pixpa’s offerings.
2. PhotographyCourse.net provides a thorough review that goes beyond superficial details (link).
3. Top10-WebsiteHosting provides an in-depth analysis of Pixpa's services (link).
4. Creative Bloq’s (link) thorough review of Pixpa

Reliability and Independence: These sources are recognized and independent within the photography and tech community, ensuring an unbiased view of Pixpa’s contributions and significance.

Secondary Sources: The sources cited are secondary, providing analysis and commentary on Pixpa rather than mere announcements or promotional content.

Additional References from Reputable News and Business Sources:

1. Business Today's coverage on Pixpa as one of the coolest start-ups (link).
2. Economic Times’ company profile on Pixpa (link).

Web Presence and Impact: I also refer to Pixpa’s usage statistics and web presence indexed by BuiltWith (link), demonstrating its significant footprint in the web builder domain.

A Note: The expectation of lengthy, traditional news articles may not align with contemporary online journalism and industry-specific coverage. While varied in format, the sources I've provided all contribute valuable, in-depth insights into Pixpa’s role and influence in its field.

Further Information Sources:

SoftwareAdvice (link) WebsitePlanet (link)

The additional sources and arguments presented here adequately address the concerns raised in your feedback. Pixpa’s influence and recognition within its niche are well-documented and significant, meriting inclusion on Wikipedia.

Thank you for reconsidering this submission. I am open to further suggestions or requirements for improving the article to meet Wikipedia's standards.

Sincerely, 4eyedpeas (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]