Apparent magnitudeWikipedia open wikipedia design.
The apparent magnitude (m) of an astronomical object is a number that is a measure of its brightness as seen by an observer on Earth. The magnitude scale is logarithmic. A difference of 1 in magnitude corresponds to a change in brightness by a factor of 5√, or about 2.512. The brighter an object appears, the lower its magnitude value (i.e. inverse relation), with the brightest astronomical objects having negative apparent magnitudes: for example Sirius at −1.46.
The measurement of apparent magnitudes or brightnesses of celestial objects is known as photometry. Apparent magnitudes are used to quantify the brightness of sources at ultraviolet, visible, and infrared wavelengths. An apparent magnitude is usually measured in a specific passband corresponding to some photometric system such as the UBV system. In standard astronomical notation, an apparent magnitude in the V ("visual") filter band would be denoted either as mV or often simply as V, as in "mV = 15" or "V = 15" to describe a 15th-magnitude object.
|Visible to |
|Number of stars |
in the night sky
The scale used to indicate magnitude originates in the Hellenistic practice of dividing stars visible to the naked eye into six magnitudes. The brightest stars in the night sky were said to be of first magnitude (m = 1), whereas the faintest were of sixth magnitude (m = 6), which is the limit of human visual perception (without the aid of a telescope). Each grade of magnitude was considered twice the brightness of the following grade (a logarithmic scale), although that ratio was subjective as no photodetectors existed. This rather crude scale for the brightness of stars was popularized by Ptolemy in his Almagest and is generally believed to have originated with Hipparchus.
In 1856, Norman Robert Pogson formalized the system by defining a first magnitude star as a star that is 100 times as bright as a sixth-magnitude star, thereby establishing the logarithmic scale still in use today. This implies that a star of magnitude m is about 2.512 times as bright as a star of magnitude m + 1. This figure, the fifth root of 100, became known as Pogson's Ratio. The zero point of Pogson's scale was originally defined by assigning Polaris a magnitude of exactly 2. Astronomers later discovered that Polaris is slightly variable, so they switched to Vega as the standard reference star, assigning the brightness of Vega as the definition of zero magnitude at any specified wavelength.
Apart from small corrections, the brightness of Vega still serves as the definition of zero magnitude for visible and near infrared wavelengths, where its spectral energy distribution (SED) closely approximates that of a black body for a temperature of 000 K. However, with the advent of 11infrared astronomy it was revealed that Vega's radiation includes an Infrared excess presumably due to a circumstellar disk consisting of dust at warm temperatures (but much cooler than the star's surface). At shorter (e.g. visible) wavelengths, there is negligible emission from dust at these temperatures. However, in order to properly extend the magnitude scale further into the infrared, this peculiarity of Vega should not affect the definition of the magnitude scale. Therefore, the magnitude scale was extrapolated to all wavelengths on the basis of the black body radiation curve for an ideal stellar surface at 000 K uncontaminated by circumstellar radiation. On this basis the 11spectral irradiance (usually expressed in janskys) for the zero magnitude point, as a function of wavelength, can be computed. Small deviations are specified between systems using measurement apparatuses developed independently so that data obtained by different astronomers can be properly compared, but of greater practical importance is the definition of magnitude not at a single wavelength but applying to the response of standard spectral filters used in photometry over various wavelength bands.
With the modern magnitude systems, brightness over a very wide range is specified according to the logarithmic definition detailed below, using this zero reference. In practice such apparent magnitudes do not exceed 30 (for detectable measurements). The brightness of Vega is exceeded by four stars in the night sky at visible wavelengths (and more at infrared wavelengths) as well as the bright planets Venus, Mars, and Jupiter, and these must be described by negative magnitudes. For example, Sirius, the brightest star of the celestial sphere, has an apparent magnitude of −1.4 in the visible. Negative magnitudes for other very bright astronomical objects can be found in the table below.
Astronomers have developed other photometric zeropoint systems as alternatives to the Vega system. The most widely used is the AB magnitude system, in which photometric zeropoints are based on a hypothetical reference spectrum having constant flux per unit frequency interval, rather than using a stellar spectrum or blackbody curve as the reference. The AB magnitude zeropoint is defined such that an object's AB and Vega-based magnitudes will be approximately equal in the V filter band.
As the amount of light actually received by a telescope is reduced by transmission through the Earth's atmosphere, any measurement of apparent magnitude is corrected for what it would have been as seen from above the atmosphere. The dimmer an object appears, the higher the numerical value given to its apparent magnitude, with a difference of 5 magnitudes corresponding to a brightness factor of exactly 100. Therefore, the apparent magnitude m, in the spectral band x, would be given by
which is more commonly expressed in terms of common (base-10) logarithms as
where Fx is the observed flux density using spectral filter x, and Fx,0 is the reference flux (zero-point) for that photometric filter. Since an increase of 5 magnitudes corresponds to a decrease in brightness by a factor of exactly 100, each magnitude increase implies a decrease in brightness by the factor 5√ ≈ 2.512 (Pogson's ratio). Inverting the above formula, a magnitude difference m1 − m2 = Δm implies a brightness factor of
Example: Sun and Moon
The apparent magnitude of the Sun is −26.74 (brighter), and the mean apparent magnitude of the full moon is −12.74 (dimmer).
Difference in magnitude:
The Sun appears about 000 times brighter than the full moon. 400
Sometimes one might wish to add brightnesses. For example, photometry on closely separated double stars may only be able to produce a measurement of their combined light output. How would we reckon the combined magnitude of that double star knowing only the magnitudes of the individual components? This can be done by adding the brightnesses (in linear units) corresponding to each magnitude.
Solving for yields
where mf is the resulting magnitude after adding the brightnesses referred to by m1 and m2.
Since flux decreases with distance according to the inverse-square law, a particular apparent magnitude could equally well refer to a star at one distance, or a star four times brighter at twice that distance, and so on. When one is not interested in the brightness as viewed from Earth, but the intrinsic brightness of an astronomical object, then one refers not to the apparent magnitude but the absolute magnitude. The absolute magnitude M, of a star or astronomical object is defined as the apparent magnitude it would have as seen from a distance of 10 parsecs (about 32.6 light-years). The absolute magnitude of the Sun is 4.83 in the V band (yellow) and 5.48 in the B band (blue). In the case of a planet or asteroid, the absolute magnitude H rather means the apparent magnitude it would have if it were 1 astronomical unit from both the observer and the Sun, and fully illuminated (a configuration that is only theoretically achievable, with the observer situated on the surface of the Sun).
Standard reference values
|Flux at m = 0, Fx,0|
It is important to note that the scale is logarithmic: the relative brightness of two objects is determined by the difference of their magnitudes. For example, a difference of 3.2 means that one object is about 19 times as bright as the other, because Pogson's Ratio raised to the power 3.2 is approximately 19.05.
A common misconception is that the logarithmic nature of the scale is because the human eye itself has a logarithmic response. In Pogson's time this was thought to be true (see Weber–Fechner law), but it is now believed that the response is a power law (see Stevens' power law).
Magnitude is complicated by the fact that light is not monochromatic. The sensitivity of a light detector varies according to the wavelength of the light, and the way it varies depends on the type of light detector. For this reason, it is necessary to specify how the magnitude is measured for the value to be meaningful. For this purpose the UBV system is widely used, in which the magnitude is measured in three different wavelength bands: U (centred at about 350 nm, in the near ultraviolet), B (about 435 nm, in the blue region) and V (about 555 nm, in the middle of the human visual range in daylight). The V band was chosen for spectral purposes and gives magnitudes closely corresponding to those seen by the light-adapted human eye, and when an apparent magnitude is given without any further qualification, it is usually the V magnitude that is meant, more or less the same as visual magnitude.
Because cooler stars, such as red giants and red dwarfs, emit little energy in the blue and UV regions of the spectrum their power is often under-represented by the UBV scale. Indeed, some L and T class stars have an estimated magnitude of well over 100, because they emit extremely little visible light, but are strongest in infrared.
Measures of magnitude need cautious treatment and it is extremely important to measure like with like. On early 20th century and older orthochromatic (blue-sensitive) photographic film, the relative brightnesses of the blue supergiant Rigel and the red supergiant Betelgeuse irregular variable star (at maximum) are reversed compared to what human eyes perceive, because this archaic film is more sensitive to blue light than it is to red light. Magnitudes obtained from this method are known as photographic magnitudes, and are now considered obsolete.
For objects within the Milky Way with a given absolute magnitude, 5 is added to the apparent magnitude for every tenfold increase in the distance to the object. For objects at very great distances (far beyond the Milky Way), this relationship must be adjusted for redshifts and for non-Euclidean distance measures due to general relativity.
For planets and other Solar System bodies the apparent magnitude is derived from its phase curve and the distances to the Sun and observer.
Table of notable celestial objects
|Celestial object ...||... as seen from|
|−67.57||gamma-ray burst GRB 080319B||as seen from 1 AU.|
|−44.00||star R136a1||as seen from 1 AU.|
|−40.07||star Zeta1 Scorpii||as seen from 1 AU.|
|−38.00||star Rigel||as seen from 1 AU. It would be seen as a large very bright bluish disk of 35° apparent diameter.|
|−30.30||star Sirius||as seen from 1 AU.|
|−29.30||star Sun||as seen from Mercury at perihelion|
|−27.40||star Sun||as seen from Venus at perihelion|
|−26.74||star Sun||as seen from Earth (about 400,000 times brighter than mean full moon)|
|−25.60||star Sun||as seen from Mars at aphelion|
|−25.00||Minimum brightness that causes the typical eye slight pain to look at|
|−23.00||star Sun||as seen from Jupiter at aphelion|
|−21.70||star Sun||as seen from Saturn at aphelion|
|−20.20||star Sun||as seen from Uranus at aphelion|
|−19.30||star Sun||as seen from Neptune|
|−18.20||star Sun||as seen from Pluto at aphelion|
|−16.70||star Sun||as seen from Eris at aphelion|
|−14.20||An illumination level of 1 lux|
|−12.90||full moon||maximum brightness of perigee+perihelion full moon (mean distance value is −12.74, though both values are about 0.18 magnitude brighter when including the opposition effect)|
|−11.20||star Sun||as seen from Sedna at aphelion|
|−10.00||Comet Ikeya–Seki (1965)||which was the brightest Kreutz Sungrazer of modern times|
|−9.50||Iridium (satellite) flare||maximum brightness|
|−7.50||supernova of 1006||the brightest stellar event in recorded history (7200 light-years away)|
|−6.50||The total integrated magnitude of the night sky||as seen from Earth|
|−6.00||Crab Supernova of 1054||(6500 light-years away)|
|−5.90||International Space Station||when the ISS is at its perigee and fully lit by the Sun|
|−4.92||planet Venus||maximum brightness when illuminated as a crescent|
|−4.14||planet Venus||mean brightness|
|−4||Faintest objects observable during the day with naked eye when Sun is high|
|−3.99||star Epsilon Canis Majoris||maximum brightness of 4.7 million years ago, the historical brightest star of the last and next five million years|
|−2.98||planet Venus||minimum brightness when it is on the far side of the Sun|
|−2.94||planet Jupiter||maximum brightness|
|−2.94||planet Mars||maximum brightness|
|−2.5||Faintest objects visible during the day with naked eye when Sun is less than 10° above the horizon|
|−2.50||new moon||minimum brightness|
|−2.48||planet Mercury||maximum brightness at superior conjunction (unlike Venus, Mercury is at its brightest when on the far side of the Sun, the reason being their different phase curves)|
|−2.20||planet Jupiter||mean brightness|
|−1.66||planet Jupiter||minimum brightness|
|−1.47||star Sirius||Brightest star (except for the Sun) at visible wavelengths|
|−0.83||star Eta Carinae||apparent brightness as a supernova impostor in April 1843|
|−0.72||star Canopus||2nd brightest star|
|−0.55||planet Saturn||maximum brightness near opposition and perihelion when the rings are wide open|
|−0.3||Halley's comet||Expected apparent magnitude at 2061 passage|
|−0.27||star system Alpha Centauri AB||The total magnitude (3rd brightest star to the naked eye)|
|−0.04||star Arcturus||4th brightest star to the naked eye|
|−0.01||star Alpha Centauri A||4th brightest individual star visible telescopically in the sky|
|+0.03||star Vega||which was originally chosen as a definition of the zero point|
|+0.23||planet Mercury||mean brightness|
|+0.50||star Sun||as seen from Alpha Centauri|
|+0.46||planet Saturn||mean brightness|
|+0.71||planet Mars||mean brightness|
|+1.17||planet Saturn||minimum brightness|
|+1.86||planet Mars||minimum brightness|
|+3.03||supernova SN 1987A||in the Large Magellanic Cloud (160,000 light-years away)|
|3...4||Faintest stars visible in an urban neighborhood with naked eye|
|4.38||moon Ganymede||maximum brightness (moon of Jupiter and the largest moon in the Solar System)|
|4.50||open cluster M41||an open cluster that may have been seen by Aristotle|
|4.5||Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy|
|5.20||asteroid Vesta||maximum brightness|
|5.38||planet Uranus||maximum brightness|
|5.68||planet Uranus||mean brightness|
|5.72||spiral galaxy M33||which is used as a test for naked eye seeing under dark skies|
|5.8||gamma-ray burst GRB 080319B||Peak visual magnitude (the "Clarke Event") seen on Earth on March 19, 2008 from a distance of 7.5 billion light-years.|
|6.03||planet Uranus||minimum brightness|
|6.49||asteroid Pallas||maximum brightness|
|6.5||Approximate limit of stars observed by a mean naked eye observer under very good conditions. There are about 9,500 stars visible to mag 6.5.|
|6.64||dwarf planet Ceres||maximum brightness|
|6.75||asteroid Iris||maximum brightness|
|6.90||spiral galaxy M81||This is an extreme naked-eyetarget that pushes human eyesight and the Bortle scale to the limit|
|7...8||Extreme naked-eye limit, Class 1 on Bortle scale, the darkest skies available on Earth|
|7.25||planet Mercury||minimum brightness|
|7.67||planet Neptune||maximum brightness|
|7.78||planet Neptune||mean brightness|
|8.00||planet Neptune||minimum brightness|
|8.10||moon Titan||maximum brightness; largest moon of Saturn; mean opposition magnitude 8.4|
|8.29||UY Scuti||Maximum brightness; largest known star by radius|
|8.94||asteroid 10 Hygiea||maximum brightness|
|9.50||Faintest objects visible using common 7×50 binoculars under typical conditions|
|10.20||moon Iapetus||maximum brightness, brightest when west of Saturn and takes 40 days to switch sides|
|10.7||Luhman 16||Closest brown dwarfs|
|11.05||Proxima Centauri||2nd closest star|
|11.8||moon Phobos||Maximum brightness; brightest moon of Mars|
|12.23||R136a1||Most luminous and massive star known|
|12.91||quasar 3C 273||brightest (luminosity distance of 2.4 billion light-years)|
|13.42||moon Triton||Maximum brightness|
|13.65||dwarf planet Pluto||maximum brightness, 725 times fainter than magnitude 6.5 naked eye skies|
|13.9||Titania||Maximum brightness; brightest moon of Uranus|
|14.1||WR 102||Hottest known star|
|15.4||centaur Chiron||maximum brightness|
|15.55||moon Charon||maximum brightness (the large moon of Pluto)|
|16.8||dwarf planet Makemake||Current opposition brightness|
|17.27||dwarf planet Haumea||Current opposition brightness of|
|18.7||dwarf planet Eris||Current opposition brightness|
|20.7||moon Callirrhoe||(small ~8 km satellite of Jupiter)|
|22||Faintest objects observable in visible light with a 600 mm (24″) Ritchey-Chrétien telescope with 30 minutes of stacked images (6 subframes at 5 minutes each) using a CCD detector|
|22.91||moon Hydra||maximum brightness of Pluto's moon|
|23.38||moon Nix||maximum brightness of Pluto's moon|
|25.0||moon Fenrir||(small ~4 km satellite of Saturn)|
|27.6||planet Jupiter||if it were located 5,000 AU (750 billion km) from the Sun|
|27.7||Faintest objects observable with an 8-meter class ground-based telescope such as the Subaru Telescope in a 10-hour image|
|28.2||Halley's Comet||in 2003 when it was 28 AU from the Sun|
|28.4||asteroid 2003 BH91||observed magnitude of ~15-kilometer Kuiper belt object Seen by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in 2003, dimmest known directly-observed asteroid.|
|31.5||Faintest objects observable in visible light with Hubble Space Telescope|
|34||Faintest objects observable in visible light with James Webb Space Telescope|
|35||unnamed asteroid||expected magnitude of dimmest known asteroid, a 950-meter Kuiper belt object discovered by the HST passing in front of a star in 2009.|
|35||star LBV 1806-20||a luminous blue variable star, expected magnitude at visible wavelengths due to interstellar extinction|
- "Vmag<6.5". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2010-06-25.
- "Magnitude". National Solar Observatory—Sacramento Peak. Archived from the original on 2008-02-06. Retrieved 2006-08-23.
- Bright Star Catalogue
- Pogson, N. (1856). "Magnitudes of Thirty-six of the Minor Planets for the first day of each month of the year 1857". MNRAS. 17: 12. Bibcode:1856MNRAS..17...12P. doi:10.1093/mnras/17.1.12.
- See .
- Oke, J. B.; Gunn, J. E. (March 15, 1983). "Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry". The Astrophysical Journal. 266: 713–717. Bibcode:1983ApJ...266..713O. doi:10.1086/160817.
- "Magnitude Arithmetic". Weekly Topic. Caglow. Retrieved 30 January 2012.
- Evans, Aaron. "Some Useful Astronomical Definitions" (PDF). Stony Brook Astronomy Program. Retrieved 2009-07-12.
- Huchra, John. "Astronomical Magnitude Systems". Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Retrieved 2017-07-18.
- Schulman, E.; Cox, C. V. (1997). "Misconceptions About Astronomical Magnitudes". American Journal of Physics. 65 (10): 1003. Bibcode:1997AmJPh..65.1003S. doi:10.1119/1.18714.
- Umeh, Obinna; Clarkson, Chris; Maartens, Roy (2014). "Nonlinear relativistic corrections to cosmological distances, redshift and gravitational lensing magnification: II. Derivation". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 31 (20): 205001. arXiv:1402.1933. Bibcode:2014CQGra..31t5001U. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205001.
- Hogg, David W.; Baldry, Ivan K.; Blanton, Michael R.; Eisenstein, Daniel J. (2002). "The K correction". arXiv:astro-ph/0210394.
- Williams, David R. (2004-09-01). "Sun Fact Sheet". NASA (National Space Science Data Center). Archived from the original on 15 July 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-03.
- Dufay, Jean (2012-10-17). Introduction to Astrophysics: The Stars. p. 3. ISBN 9780486607719.
- McLean, Ian S. (2008). Electronic Imaging in Astronomy: Detectors and Instrumentation. Springer. p. 529. ISBN 978-3-540-76582-0.
- Williams, David R. (2010-02-02). "Moon Fact Sheet". NASA (National Space Science Data Center). Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- "Brightest comets seen since 1935". International Comet Quarterly. Retrieved 18 December 2011.
- Winkler, P. Frank; Gupta, Gaurav; Long, Knox S. (2003). "The SN 1006 Remnant: Optical Proper Motions, Deep Imaging, Distance, and Brightness at Maximum". The Astrophysical Journal. 585 (1): 324–335. arXiv:astro-ph/0208415. Bibcode:2003ApJ...585..324W. doi:10.1086/345985.
- "Supernova 1054 – Creation of the Crab Nebula". SEDS.
- "ISS Information - Heavens-above.com". Heavens-above. Retrieved 2007-12-22.
- Mallama, A.; Hilton, J.L. (2018). "Computing Apparent Planetary Magnitudes for The Astronomical Almanac". Astronomy and Computing. 25: 10–24. Bibcode:2018A&C....25...10M. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2018.08.002.
- "Sirius". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "Canopus". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "Arcturus". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "Vega". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2010-04-14.
- "SIMBAD-M31". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2009-11-29.
- Yeomans; Chamberlin. "Horizon Online Ephemeris System for Ganymede (Major Body 503)". California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 2010-04-14. (4.38 on 1951-Oct-03)
- "M41 possibly recorded by Aristotle". SEDS (Students for the Exploration and Development of Space). 2006-07-28. Retrieved 2009-11-29.
- "Uranus Fact Sheet". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2018-11-08.
- "SIMBAD-M33". SIMBAD Astronomical Database. Retrieved 2009-11-28.
- Lodriguss, Jerry (1993). "M33 (Triangulum Galaxy)". Retrieved 2009-11-27. (Shows bolometric magnitude not visual magnitude.)
- "Messier 81". SEDS (Students for the Exploration and Development of Space). 2007-09-02. Retrieved 2009-11-28.
- John E. Bortle (February 2001). "The Bortle Dark-Sky Scale". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 2009-11-18.
- "Neptune Fact Sheet". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2018-11-08.
- Yeomans; Chamberlin. "Horizon Online Ephemeris System for Titan (Major Body 606)". California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 2010-06-28. (8.10 on 2003-Dec-30) Archived November 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Classic Satellites of the Solar System". Observatorio ARVAL. Archived from the original on 31 July 2010. Retrieved 2010-06-25.
- "Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters". JPL (Solar System Dynamics). 2009-04-03. Archived from the original on 23 July 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-25.
- "AstDys (10) Hygiea Ephemerides". Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- Zarenski, Ed (2004). "Limiting Magnitude in Binoculars" (PDF). Cloudy Nights. Retrieved 2011-05-06.
- "What Is the Most Massive Star?". Space.com. Retrieved 2018-11-05.
- Williams, David R. (2006-09-07). "Pluto Fact Sheet". National Space Science Data Center. NASA. Archived from the original on 1 July 2010. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "AstDys (2060) Chiron Ephemerides". Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "AstDys (136472) Makemake Ephemerides". Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- "AstDys (136108) Haumea Ephemerides". Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved 2010-06-26.
- Steve Cullen (sgcullen) (2009-10-05). "17 New Asteroids Found by LightBuckets". LightBuckets. Archived from the original on 2010-01-31. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
- Sheppard, Scott S. "Saturn's Known Satellites". Carnegie Institution (Department of Terrestrial Magnetism). Retrieved 2010-06-28.
- Magnitude difference is 2.512 log10[(5000/5)2 × (4999/4)2] ˜ 30.6, so Jupiter is 30.6 magnitudes fainter at 5000 AU
- What is the faintest object imaged by ground-based telescopes?, by: The Editors of Sky Telescope, July 24, 2006
- "New Image of Comet Halley in the Cold". ESO. 2003-09-01. Archived from the original on 1 March 2009. Retrieved 2009-02-22.
- Illingworth, G. D.; Magee, D.; Oesch, P. A.; Bouwens, R. J.; Labbé, I.; Stiavelli, M.; van Dokkum, P. G.; Franx, M.; Trenti, M.; Carollo, C. M.; Gonzalez, V. (21 October 2013). "The HST eXtreme Deep Field XDF: Combining all ACS and WFC3/IR Data on the HUDF Region into the Deepest Field Ever". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 209 (1): 6. arXiv:1305.1931. Bibcode:2013ApJS..209....6I. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/6.
- http://www.jaymaron.com/telescopes/telescopes.html (retrieved Sep 14 2017)
- "NASA – Hubble Finds Smallest Kuiper Belt Object Ever Seen". www.nasa.gov. NASA. Retrieved 16 March 2018.
- "The astronomical magnitude scale". International Comet Quarterly.