User talk:Mr.work-shy

Hi Mr.work-shy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Alith Anar 18:25, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits so far – you showed up on my watchlist, and I'm pleased to meet a helpful newcomer. Thanks for edits like this and this. Cheers, Cremastra talk 23:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 14:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mr.work-shy, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr.work-shy,

It's hard to believe you have only had an account for one week when you have made over 1,000 edits during that period of time. It typically takes new editors months to accumulate that many edits.

But the reason for this message is that I see you deleting messages from your User talk page. In the future, please archive old messages. You can even configure a bot to handle this for you automatically although most editors handle this manually. But moving older messages to a User talk page archive page is how long-term editors handle clearing off their talk page and I recommend you starting to do it as well. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz They are still just deleting. Doug Weller talk 10:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I does not know how to appoint a boat to handle it I am a new editor. Mr.work-shy (talk) 12:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bot Mr.work-shy (talk) 12:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE or the WP:HELPDESK. Meanwhile, stop deleting. You deleted something as I was replying to it. A lot of editors have very long talk pages, it won't hurt you to have a long one. A lot of editors who do what you do are making it hard to see how many warnings they've been given. Doug Weller talk 13:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok senior, this will never happen again Mr.work-shy (talk) 13:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.work-shy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Revert request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Gulou South Street Mosque. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:32, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 plz move this draft to Article

Thnx u Mr.work-shy (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for an AFC reviewer to take a look at it. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Xinhua Road Mosque (Tacheng City). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Lacks content, no category, multiple issues . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Work-shy. Your edits have introduced a large number of technical errors in the text that have become too complicated to fix. I have taken the edits back to the last known good version before you began editing. When you are editing, please:

• Provide an explanation for the changes you were trying to make for each edit. This way other editors can understand what you were trying to do.
• Preview every edit that you make to check that you have not broken anything or mislinked things.
• Note the country name is 'Solomon Islands', not 'the Solomon Islands'. Hence the page name. Refer to the main page for Solomon Islands for the country name. It was known as the Solomon Islands only in colonial times. They have moved on.
• The page language was British English. All the many Solomon Islands pages are either British English or Australian English. Australian English is the version adopted by the country for spelling etc and is taught in schools. This article is not about India, or strongly connected to India so Indian English is inappropriate.
• Sources According to many sources is not an acceptable source, must have a citation.

Happy editing, but please slow down, check your work carefully as you go and be mindful of the cultural sensibilities of others with an interest in the page. Ex nihil ^(talk) 12:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thnx u, for highlighting my mistake. Mr.work-shy (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox lists 6 religions, why tag only one with a CN tag? Doug Weller talk 10:57, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to be consistent. At Shan people you correctly remove Christianity as unsourced, yet in the article above you didn't give a cn tag to any other religion, just Christianity. Doug Weller talk 11:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

in Chuanqing people, there is not a section of religion so I add the CN tag, and in Shan people, there is a section for religion but does not have any clue of presence of Christianity. The editor who add this should atleast add a single line with source for verification. If I have done something that violates Wikipedia guidelines please correct me.@Doug Weller

Thank u Mr.work-shy (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Islam in Chile. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Adding a see also is not a "ce", which means copy edit. Doug Weller talk 11:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u senior for correcting me Mr.work-shy (talk) 12:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A 1992 source isn't very useful. See [1] Doug Weller talk 15:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is too confusing because multiple sources give different statistics 1000-5000. I already add invisible note in page Mr.work-shy (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I update it according to your command Mr.work-shy (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.work-shy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Islam in South Asia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.work-shy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Split Article Request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gulou South Street Mosque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]