User talk:Lpangelrob

Awaiting a reply from New York for the highways I am reviewing and have on hold. Should come tomorrow. Will notify you as well, as you are reviewing one or two articles. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info was to come last Friday of June, maybe the Canada Day July 1 and July 4 celebrations / stats held up the mail. So now must wait till Monday to see what the postman brings. The file was too big to email. SriMesh | talk 22:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed everything, let me know if the changes work. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you thinking about nominating North Avenue Bridge for WP:GAC? You should. Also, take a look at BP Pedestrian Bridge. I am thinking of nominating it at WP:FAC. Any thoughts?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know you can find 100 year old pictures of this bridge at [Library of Congress]. Use the same type of image description tags as you see on the images at Chicago Race Riot of 1919 if you want to use any of them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you had "adopted" SS Samuel Huntington for a GA review a week ago. Is your review still in progress? If not, can you please "release" the article so that it might get a more timely review? Many thanks in advance. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoped it was something simple like that. Thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please review the discussion going on at Talk:Truss bridge#Use of the HAER Publication on Truss Types as a Reference Document. Input from members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges would be appreciated. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 04:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think all the issues have now been addressed. Please let me know if the changes work. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the late delivery; here is the June edition of the newsletter.

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How are they not a reliable source?Bodo920 (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the research I did, the best info I could come up with was this. It shows an overlap on I-55. In emails to the FHWA, they said they'd research the subject but never got back to me.Bodo920 (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO, but you have a userspace page linked to {{User WPChicago}}. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members where you may currently be listed as inactive. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at Wikipedia:CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on? I am sorry for the long delay, but I solved all your laundry list issues. I was wondering if it was passable now?Mitch32^(UP) 16:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—Rschen7754bot (talk) 03:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:RoselleIllinoisLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops forgot to make those 2 lvl headers. Thanks, RockManQ ^(talk) 02:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lpangelrob. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit User:Rschen7754/USRDCRWPCup. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 04:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 155 (Illinois) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a couple years late but you're welcome (about I-355) glad to help.—JA10 Talk • Contribs 03:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your status has been changed to inactive at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Interstate 355 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your WP:TFA! --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Auxiliary routes of Interstate 80 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Handled by {{I-80 aux}}.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rschen7754 04:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— JCbot (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Il4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— JCbot (talk) 02:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— JCbot (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

—

JCbot (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

—Rschen7754bot (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We miss you and could use your input at Talk:Link_Bridge#Merge.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roanoke-tornado-july-04-parsons-after.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

—JCbot (talk) 01:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chicagoland-highways.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—Imzadi 1979 → 00:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to see how you were doing, and to say that we miss you! --Rschen7754 08:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—EdwardsBot (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

—EdwardsBot (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

—EdwardsBot (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

—EdwardsBot (talk) 03:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Starved Rock State Park, Illinois -- Small.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]