User talk:Deeptrivia

Home	Talk	New message	Gallery     About

The May 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 05:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Deeptrivia. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:14anna.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Deeptrivia/Album. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello,

correct me if i am wrong, the pic for shukra is wrongs. i think the picture show the form of Surya.

Thanks alot.

nash —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Juenash (talk • contribs) 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hey Deep, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--Cronholm144 21:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Great userpage!

Hello, Deeptrivia. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:DalaiLama.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Deeptrivia/Inspiration. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi deeptrivia, I finally have some time to start doing a major revision of the page (recall your comments), which I had originally planned to do much earlier (after the RfC in March). I hope you'll have some time to look in every now and then and offer criticism, or if you have more time, help with the revision itself. Thanks. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this. Arrow740 03:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The verb "to convert" has two uses. The first is intransitive, and that is how it was used in Buddhism and Hinduism. In this sense it means to change one's own religion. The other sense is transitive, and then it means to induce someone else to change his religion. In this sense, it is a synonym for the verb "to proselytize." In Indian English the verb "to proselytize" is basically obsolete and it has been replaced with "to convert" in the transitive sense {{fact}]. However in standard English "convert" is almost always used in the first sense ^{[citation needed]}. In that sense there can be no objection; Ashoka converted to Buddhism after experiencing sadness after a battle^{[citation needed]}, Guru Angad Dev converted^{[citation needed]} to Sikhism after hearing sermons of Guru Nanak, etc. In fact all the Dharmic religions were at some point in their history proselytizing religions^{[citation needed]}. Buddhism still is^{[citation needed]}. That's why^{[citation needed]} Buddhism is spreading among non-Asians in the West. However this aspect of Buddhism is not nearly as pronounced as in Christianity and Islam. Hinduism was once a very active proselytizing religion^{[citation needed]}, though Hindus were mostly interested in converting other Indians. At one time, most of India was Buddhist (because of Buddhist monks spreading the message and convincing people to convert^{[citation needed]}). It was partially due to the work of Hindu proselytizers such as Adi Shankara (but mostly due to the Muslim hordes) that Buddhism almost completely died out in India. Arrow740 05:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that the Dalai Lama is only the leader of one sect^{[citation needed]} of Tibetan Buddhists. Arrow740 05:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:RS. Arrow740 07:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This fact tagging of my posts on talk pages is cute, but don't do it outside of this page. Arrow740 06:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fayssal, could you transfer the history of Amitabh Bachchan Balwan Pehelwan Suleiman Akbar Jehangir Shahjehan Aurangzeb Yusuf Moosa Dawood Mohammed Iqbal Rasool Rashid to Amitabh Bachchan, or delete Amitabh Bachchan and then move Amitabh Bachchan Balwan Pehelwan Suleiman Akbar Jehangir Shahjehan Aurangzeb Yusuf Moosa Dawood Mohammed Iqbal Rasool Rashid to there, or something like that. I think you can guess what happened. Thanks. deeptrivia (talk) 03:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two admins beat me to it while i was sleeping ;) -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 12:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:14anna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You put a POV tag on that article, but you didn't say why.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 03:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blnguyen. Could you please look at recent edits on Buddhism and Hinduism. A user seems to have broken WP:3RR, and is acting here in a way that appears unreasonable to me. deeptrivia (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He does not appear to have broken 3RR, and the revertwarring has stopped for a while. I will try and take a read but I don't know anything about this stuff specifically. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deeptrivia - I share your frustration regarding this article, but at present do not have the time to dedicate to trying to resolve the problem. Shame, as it could be an interesting article. Will keep on my watchlist for any siginificant changes in future. Best Wishes, Gouranga(UK) 14:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there!

I saw your name on the participants' list for Wikiproject Indian Cinema. I've seen your work all over, and I was wondering if you could have a look at Rani Mukerji. The page has progressed in the last few days, but its lead paragraph could do with a look at. Your comments would be appreciated.

My apologies if this all seems a little random. I saw you on the list right under Zora and you're a far more experienced contributor than I am, so I thought I'd ask you request your guidance.

Regards,xC | ☎ 05:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for all your work on Buddhism articles here. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crimsongold.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Newpaisa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you already have a rationale here, but you have not mentioned the source. I cannot help here since I do not know where you got the image from.--PremKudva^Talk 11:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kundun-poster01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ormytreasure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pashupati.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dabboo Ratnani needs a proper bio, an infobox, and of course a complete list of celebrities who appeared through the years on his famous calendar. The sample image from his calendar also needs more critical commentary with references. Ananthabhadram needs quite some work, too, though I can't really pinpoint the problems yet. Aditya Kabir 06:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Buddhism_and_Hinduism#Notable_views, I took some context from the sources you used and placed it in a more appropriate location. Please self-revert. Arrow740 20:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My idea is to show all of Ladakh highlighted in semi-transparent light red or reddish-orange. Indian-administered Ladakh would then be shaded as it is now (semi-transparent dark red). If we did this, then the article would need to be NPOVed by stating both in the lead and infobox that Ladakh is divided between the PRC and India. The infobox would have a "Countries" field (like in {{Geobox River}} or {{Geobox Mountain Range}}; see Ganges or Andes for examples) that lists both India and the PRC. To make sure about this, Nichalp and Planemad should be consulted, since they are more familiar with this sort of stuff. Thanks. Saravask 05:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion at Talk:Islam#Mughals might interest you. Arrow740 01:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yuje is claiming on Talk:Sino-Indian War that India claimed Bhutan and Tibet and attempts to use Indian government maps to prove this. He also denies China ever claimed Sikkim. As you reverted his map edits once, please provide input on this matter. Traing 07:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Aryan religion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Hello Deeptrivia, thanks for pointing out my mistake on the Urdu article. I used the same link format that I had used on the article on Duke University and copy/pasted the same format into the Urdu article but accidentally neglected to change the link. Thanks for letting me know. I highly appreciate you and your contributions on the Urdu article and Wikipedia in general. With regards, Anupam^Talk 23:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you changed Pakistani to Indian politician in this article? He was born in Karachi and died in Karachi. I can put it as Indo-Pak politican. Shinas 14:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I, with no doubt, reverted your edits. Please clearly read the original text of the Simla document:

As cross-examination, I would like to tell you M.C. Goldstein's History of Modern Tibet, like it or not Deeptrivia, also mentions the Appendix on page 75:

FYI, both Lochen Shatra and "GOI" representative signed the Note Exchange. - 219.79.120.208 09:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is also what it says: "The Government of China engages not to convert Tibet into a Chinese province." deeptrivia (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um...I raise no question on adding that. Successive Chinese governments factually have zero interest in transforming Tibet into a province, as of 2007 Tibet is still a Chinese region instead of a province. :) - 219.79.120.208 10:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy – [1]. :) — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 15:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DeepT was only looking carefully. He is a pacifist ;) -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 15:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you had questions about Agra, Ok. Email me at:

Saintchaseallen@msn.com

Thanks

Deeptrivia, I wanted to clarify that I initiated the definitional discussion on the Hinduism talk page, not because I though your edit was "wrong", but rather because I though that it raised a substantiative issue that perhaps we need to establish consensus over. In fact with hindsight, I think I should have started the discussion before I reverted your version, rather than after. Though I'd drop you a line to explain my thinking. Regards. Abecedare 22:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I like your taste in world films - very interesting indeed I'm impressed - not the usual Hollywood blockbusters. Incidentally I started the Himilaya article and its director Eric Valli. I'd like to get the DVD someday, Where did you ge tthe chance to see that world concoction of films???? PLease note I created Template:Filmrationale for use on film posters and screenshots -it saves you have to add the rationale

Feel free to help any of these lists:

Any help would be more than apprecaiated

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 19:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sw cover 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dear we can talk about it.i have read pakistan studies ,what sort of source you want.i can give you,but do not revert it or make things complicate.beacuse i can use undo option too from here. Khalidkhoso 15:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you want me to scan whole book for Pakistan studies, I will do it for you and upload it here, so you might believe it. I have added reviews from newspapers wrote by some Sindhi authors. it will take my time to get those, I will do it for you

Khalidkhoso 15:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated 3 RR rule. You be warned.Khalidkhoso 15:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you can make correction in languages rather then to remove whole stuff.Khalidkhoso 15:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you are not supposed to violate 3RR for any reason.Khalidkhoso 15:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am agreed about (80% in article) but I wanted to add some thing more, but i will find source so that other users not should have issue. by the way I keep myself out of war stuff(edit war) as you started just while ago.Khalidkhoso 15:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have my deepest sympathy. Hornplease 16:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Blnguyen for reverting vandalism on my userpage. That was a "response" to my filing Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Nadirali. Nadirali was one of the users banned as a result of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan, where you were an arbitrator. The user's response also includes creating a silly Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Deeptrivia and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Deeptrivia, which I've marked for speedy deletion, although I don't know if such pages could be marked for speedy deletions. Regards, deeptrivia (talk) 13:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had indeed noticed that it was a point violation, which is why I blocked him yesterday for 24 hours. In the meantime, Jpgordon has confirmed that he is a sock, so he was now indefinitely blocked and the year long ban has been reset. Another admin has already deleted the point violations. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References: Notes and citations section; change in reference and notes temporarily ceased; WP:FOOT says I am not doing wrong; Separate Notes and Citation sections

Opinion is sought from regular editors of the article Hinduism regarding the splitting of Notes and references section. This is a short gist of the discussions going on in the above mentioned talk links: Having a separate "Notes" (for explanatory remarks) and "Citations" (for direct citations), although permitted, is relatively rare in Wikipedia, and also in academic journals. The main rationale behind doing this is to distinguish a series of explanatory remarks from the series of citations (please see Rabindranath Tagore, Demosthenes for examples).

This sandbox gives a glimpse of how the article would look if we split the sections (the sandbox is under work, so may not be perfect). This link shows how the article looks with combined section. This may give an idea how it looked when I started working on references. I converted many references to Harvard format, apart from splitting the sections.

Opinion for regular editors are sought regarding the application of splitting of two section for this article. Please do so in Talk:Hinduism in the section Talk:Hinduism#Seeking_opinion_from_regular_editors_on_reference_pattern. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pashupati.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the word gram nyayalaya from the nyaya panchayat articles becaused these two are different concepts. Gram Nyayalayas refer to the recent attempt of Ministery of Law to introduce mobile court with judges but Nyaya Panchayat is the village level dispute resolution mechanism by people themselves.

Thanks for uploading Image:Higherself.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate it if you would check out the article on White people and comment on this discussion. Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 11:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Higherself.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deeptrivia,
I came across the question you had posed at the Math ref. desk. While I don't have a direct answer for why the computation of ${\displaystyle det(I+e^{A})}$ is so numerically sensitive (although I suspect it has to do with the ill-conditioning of A), I was intrigued by an even more basic problem: Why does matlab find rank(A) = 6, while clearly it should be ≤5, since the fourth and fifth columns of the matrix are identical ?
Aside: Do you have the singular values of A handy ? Abecedare 07:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you seem to have contributed to Apostasy#In_Hinduism_and_Buddhism a while back. Would you care to see a current discussion there? 76.200.153.67 00:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 00:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indo greek page

Deeptrivia,

It is truly unfortunate that someone who spends as much time on the indian articles as you do is enabling PHG's systematic biasing of indian articles. He claims every indian accomplishment and dynasty under the sun as products of the greeks (chalukyas = seleucids,sikander al sani on khilji's coins = greek coinage influence? come on). Worst of all, he is stomping out dissent on the various perspetives on the indo greek period. To him, nothing less than the entire northern half of the subcontinent must have been ruled by the indo greeks--a preposterous notion considering there is no archaeological evidence to substantiate that. in fact, even european scholars (see talk page "End of the road for the Indo Greeks" acknowledge that it is foolish to proclaim colonial theories as writ without hard evidence coming to the fore. If you are going to involve yourself into the debate, at least have the decency to address the legitimate questions raised by those who actually want objective history in these articles.

Since you took part in the recent RfC on Talk:India, it would be great if you could weigh in here. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at Article North India and comment on it on the talk page? I've made some efforts changing it... especially at removing the POV statements... Mugunth 07:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hope you're doing well. Someone deleted the great map that you made showing the distribution of Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan. I suspect it was a sockpuppet of user: NisarKand who claims Balochistan as Pashtun land. Can you please upload it again? -- Behnam 00:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for Image:SwastikaCurve.png. I have a request. I wonder if you would consider making the lines thicker and the bounding box around the curve a bit smaller, so that the curve shows up better on the Swastika Curve article. Now it is kind of hard to see.

Otherwise, if you post the source code in the image page (which is a good idea always), I can regenerate the picture myself. Thanks. You can reply here. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May be you are right, but I am pretty convinced that Greater India, Indies, Undivided India and Indosphere are by and large variations of the same subject, and can very well be merged together to make for a comprehensive understanding of the subject. Currently the understanding of the extent of Indian civilization in the past and in the present is spread over a number of rather short articles, which make for a somewhat diminished understanding. I have an intention to merge all that together. May be you can lend your advises or a hand there. Please, reply to my talk page. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 17:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I guess I'll pass the classical part. Will it be alright if I start merging the other articles (Indosphere not included)? And, in that case, I see little point in having a separate article for Indianized kingdoms and Indosphere. All these articles can be forked and split as and when they grow. My target is a simple one - creating an easy access to global India, which also includes the Indian diaspora. Any ideas? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 07:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Dineshkannambadi 19:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

     Would Jimmy wales be visiting India, anytime next year, 

like his visit last year to places like Chennai. If you're in touch with him, or are aware of any contacts, Please let me know.

Thanks Logik 18:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nonhuman, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nonhuman is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nonhuman, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atari400 is, in my opinion falsely, claiming that Afghanistan and Balochistan are not part of the Indosphere. I do not agree with him at all. Seeing that you monitor the Indosphere page, can you throw in your two cents on debate. This debate started on the Indosphere countries/territories template, and moments ago I transferred the entrie template talk page onto the indosphere article talk page. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 10:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. It appears that you are actively trying to "stack the consensus". You may see my opinion as being false, but your's comes across as rather nationalistic, and perhaps can even interpreted as bigoted by some. Atari400 18:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, please fight somewhere else. deeptrivia (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He started it. Atari400 18:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And a happy new year to you.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 03:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bless you! I find reversions and deletions so frustrating! I'll make a short section for the Ganesha article and I'll link to Hindu Milk Miracle, an article I didn't know existed. Hooray! David G Brault (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They deleted it again. Can you help me out, comment on the talk page, put the section back better, something? I am going to bed now, but I wish the section would be quickly put back up- I think it's interesting and significant. David G Brault (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi if you are interested, can you give a third opinion on this here? thanks Mugunth^{(ping me!!!,contribs)} 05:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:GULFINR.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have added a detailed rationale for this image. Please correct if you notice anything amiss.--PremKudva^Talk 11:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:INR1922.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have added a detailed rationale for this image. Please correct if you notice anything amiss.--PremKudva^Talk 11:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:INR1943.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC):Please note that I have added a detailed rationale for this image. Please correct if you notice anything amiss.--PremKudva^Talk 11:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I briefly tagged this for speedy deletion, then reversed my decision; it doesn't seem to me to have a lot of notability, but I note that you're working in this area and have a long history with this type of article. I trust this is satisfactory; doubtless you intend to improve this stub. If I can be of any assistance, let me know. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, are you someone we could ask in the future when we need Devanagari at an article? All the people who used to add it are no longer on Wiki. Badagnani (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add Devanagari for Drut? Badagnani (talk) 06:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A merger discussion is now taking place, please input your view. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sw cover 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:1PAISA ST.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Morocco Open Tasks/Copyedit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Morocco Open Tasks/Expansion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Morocco Open Tasks/Maps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Morocco Open Tasks/Missing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Morocco Open Tasks/Top requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Vedic meter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rudra-kurukshetra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rudra-the aryan crusade-cd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Indosphere, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indosphere and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[2]

Here is my gift for you. Please support Tibet and Tibetan people. Please share this image to your friends. Good luck!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beijing2008GamesOverlogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 03:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guy!

I think you may be interested in this. Please add this article to your watchlist as soon as possible.

Thank you so much and best wishes to you!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 03:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We're looking for editors to improve History of Tibet to Good Article status. Since you've contributed to the article in the past, I hope you'll be able to participate. (talk) 00:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Earthquake Information for Pakistan.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? zandweb (talk) 00:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've commented on your talk page on the Commons, concerning your vegetarian labeling in India picture. -kotra (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kazi Nazrul Islam has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 12:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 14:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pakistan Newsletter

Shi'a-Sunni sectarianism! What next?

Wikipedia has always had its fair share of disputes. The issues surrounding debates like creationism-evolutionism had been a source of many edit wars. But recently enough, the ball-of-chaos had landed in our very own court. Pakistani issues are now polluted with a new sectarianism, especially the biographical articles celebrating some of the most influential people in Pakistani politics. These edit wars annoyed administrators who had no idea how the problems should be dealt with. Instances of religious inclination (either Shi'a Islam or Sunni Islam) were changed from one or the other. Debates have kicked off on the WP Pakistan talk page. Recently enough, a new policy has come into discussion (actually, it's just a set of rules) that defines major guidlines for such issues. It now awaits votes from all Pakistani editors.

---

In other news: Akhtar Hameed Khan has finally reached the FA status and Islescape is the happiest person on Earth.

Email to Postal Mail

A convenient free postal mail service which can deliver email messages all over Pakistan. Peoples can now use their email to send letters giving you another route to communicate with others who are not connected to the Internet in Pakistan.

In recent past Internet and e-mail have revolutionized the world of communications. But those who do not have easy access to Internet and e-mail facilities could not get benefits of this facility. In its endeavour to make the benefits of e-mail available to a common man, Al Tayyeb Group has introduced i-post service. By i-post all those who do not have computer or do not have access to Internet can send e-mail by Post Office or receive e-mail through a postman. Those who have access to Internet can also send i-post to those who do not have access to Internet.

Wikipedia should have an article on this social service & must be a part of WikiProject Pakistan.Please comments. --SaqibChaudhry (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Email to Postal Mail

A convenient free postal mail service which can deliver email messages all over Pakistan. Peoples can now use their email to send letters giving you another route to communicate with others who are not connected to the Internet in Pakistan.

In recent past Internet and e-mail have revolutionized the world of communications. But those who do not have easy access to Internet and e-mail facilities could not get benefits of this facility. In its endeavour to make the benefits of e-mail available to a common man, Al Tayyeb Group has introduced i-post service. By i-post all those who do not have computer or do not have access to Internet can send e-mail by Post Office or receive e-mail through a postman. Those who have access to Internet can also send i-post to those who do not have access to Internet.

Wikipedia should have an article on this social service & must be a part of WikiProject Pakistan.Please comments. --SaqibChaudhry (talk) 09:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cambpunt.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Punting in Cambridge.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Punting in Cambridge.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pashupati.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a post that you made on the talk page on 11 September 2006. Make sure to read the article whenever you find time. JSR (talk) 14:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a question on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Romani people#Help needed. Please have a look. Thank you. Sebastian scha. (talk) 00:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi deeptrivia, me and some other users noticed that the saddlenode.gif runs kind of fast. so i wanted to ask you if you could change the animation speed, please.

it's a good illustration and i thank you for providing it!!! it's just tooo fast. thanks! 88.75.227.55 (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I didn't realise this project existed!

I had the idea to set up a WikiDharma.org. That actual domain name is held by a domain farmer but I have bought and parked related names. I don't want to reinvent the [Dharma] Wheel or throw away work that has already been done.

What I have done to date is create an outline of the type of content that I think would be useful for a WikiDharma. A full project plan for WikiDharma is here: http://herdingkatsu.blogspot.com/

Maybe there is some food for thought in there or maybe not.

Mike. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Haitch (talk • contribs) 18:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you are back to regular editing! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 18:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
		Awarded to Deeptrivia, one of the most prolific editors from India. We are proud of you ! -- Tinu Cherian - 08:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In September you commented on a non-consensus move of the article Indian cuisine to its current name Cuisine of India. There is currently a discussion to return the article to its former name. I would like to invite you to comment on the proposal which is listed here. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 08:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a pleasant surprise! (Not only to get a barnstar, but also to hear from you.) Have you been away from Wikipedia? If so, welcome back! Thanks ever so much for the barnstar! It is my first history barnstar and it will be cherished. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As with the Indian cuisine articles, please contribute to these discussions:

• Cuisine of Bangladesh to Bangladeshi cuisine - (discuss) over redirect.
• Georgian (country) cuisine to Georgian cuisine - (discuss) over redirect.
• Cuisine of Burma to Burmese cuisine - (discuss) over redirect.
• Cuisine of Cambodia to Cambodian cuisine - (discuss) over redirect.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 05:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the copyrighted Navagraha images, which are placed in the Navagraha articles as fair use as they violate "No free equivalent" clause of Wikipedia:Non-free content. The owners of the site should be contacted again and a permission sent to wikimedia using OTRS. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 08:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Budha Yantra.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Budh°planet.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chandra Yantra.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chandra img.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]