Template talk:DNA antivirals

TfD debate[edit]

This template survived a discussion at TfD. Several editors said it should be 'flattened' in some way. The debate can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Arcadian 19:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should viricides be added to this template? -- stillnotelf has a talk page 02:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, but I'd reckon not. This template seems to be for drugs taken internally. Perhaps ask Ben.c.roberts, the user who originated it ..?  Best wishes, David Kernow 18:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also tend towards no, I just thought it should be brought up. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 23:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

I propose this template be split into HIV and non-HIV antivirals. It's getting very big. User:Hopping T 04:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can see what I created at Template:HIVpharm.User:Hopping T 22:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a pretty good idea. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOV-002 is currently in Phase III under Fast Track Special Protocol Assessment. why are you saying Never to Phase III?

http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00347412

Fully enrolled Phase III trial link supplied.

Bixbyte (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Bixbyte[reply]