User talk:Stevertigo

This user has been banned indefinitely from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions · discussion at ANI)

Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

The instances where "God" was changed to "Yahweh" refer exclusively to the Judeo-Christian god, so the switch was made to reflect that. Considering there are other conceptions of gods, many of which go by "God" in everyday conversation amongst sharers of such conceptions, the change is intended to eliminate vagueness and establish a neutral point of view. - 69.85.216.188 (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. -69.85.216.188 (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Go (game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Go (game) for things which need to be addressed. GoP_T^C_N 15:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Apologies for taking awhile to reply. Have been busy moving. Let me know if I can do anything more to help! Benkenobi18 (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Gun debates in article space. I don't know if you wish to assist. I had noticed that you defended your deletion very well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bennett's laws, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ebit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Go (game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligent life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scoop (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software product. (Slash was also not notable).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mythpage88 (talk) 17:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scoop (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoop (software) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mythpage88 (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sacred (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sacred Ground

The Responsibility of Intellectuals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Quagmire

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

You offended the religious faith and feelings of Sunni Muslims by uploading a image of holy prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wa aleyhi wasallam on your page Christianity and islam it's prohibited in islam personel law board Shariah to potray or illustrate any kind of living being image belonging to holy prophets a.s. and broke Shariah s rule kindly delete tahat image immediately otherwise we have to take legal action against that. Farhanfurkan (talk) 07:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As part of Wiki Loves Monuments, we're organizing two photo events in the San Francisco Bay Area and one in Yosemite National Park. We hope you can come out and participate! Feel free to contact User:Almonroth with questions or concerns.

There are three events planned:

• September 15, Saturday - A bike ride along San Francisco's waterfront
• September 22-23rd, Saturday-Sunday - Wiki Takes Yosemite
• September 29, Saturday - A sunset and harvest moon bridges, palace, boats and tower tour

We look forward to seeing you there!

You are receiving this message because you signed up on the SF Bay Area event listing, or have attended an event in the Bay Area. To remove yourself, please go here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Honour Betrayed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honour Betrayed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Would you object to using WP:EXPLAIN as a shortcut for the policy Wikipedia:Editing policy#Be helpful: explain? The redirect was originally created as a shortcut for a similar page, Wikipedia:Explain your views, until it was merged into Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. The shortcut, used afterwards for Wikipedia:Explanationism, has few incoming links, and could be substituted with WP:EXPLISM. I've boldly done so, but if you have any objections, feel free to revert. Thank you.--SGCM (talk) 19:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Kind of Blue (disambiguation), Stevertigo!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good disambiguation page!

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fan Tingyu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xie He (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Steve,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 13:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

PBS idents, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents (6th nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of PBS idents during the discussion but should not remove the article for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dance film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and licenses, please?

• m:File:EloquenceSunflowerBlue-SmallmodifbySV.png
• m:File:Stevertigoglobeicon.png
• m:File:Wikipedemedium.jpg
• m:File:Forkno logo.jpg
• m:File:Jefftl logosubmission 7-03xx.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix2z.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix4a.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix4r.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix4u.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix2s.png
• m:File:Stevertigo Phoenix4w.png
• m:File:Stevertigo PG.jpg
• m:File:SV-WBscreen.png
• m:File:Splitfieldsedit.png
• m:File:Sb-scr.png
• m:File:Sb-scr-editing.png
• m:File:Sb-talk.png
• m:File:TieredDR.png
• m:File:TieredDR.svg

--Jusjih (talk) 09:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 16 - Ada Lovelace Day Celebration - You are invited!

Come celebrate Ada Lovelace Day at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco on October 16! This event, hosted by the Ada Initiative, the Mozilla Foundation, and the Wikimedia Foundation. It'll be a meet up style event, though you are welcome to bring a laptop and edit about women in STEM if you wish. Come mix, mingle and celebrate the legacy of the world's first computer programmer. The event is October 16, 5:00 pm - 8:00 pm, everyone is welcome! You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Naming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Judith Donath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Based on these sources, she fails GNG. Just speaking at Wikimania and being a Berkman fellow doesn't make you notable, I believe. I hate to do this, but just doing my job as a Wikipedian!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SarahStierch (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve. FYI I have nominated Judith Donath for DYK. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Judith Donath, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Judith Donath has explored the use of artificial emotions in avatars and their potential use in online advertising? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Judith Donath. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-Islamic. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-Islamic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-Islam. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-Islam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Congratulations on all the hard work on Wikipedia for over 10 years! :) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you began discussing moving this well-used redirect, did it not occur to you to drop a line to the person that created it?

More importantly, that redirect was around for a very long time and was much used. Apparently, the old uses have been tidied up, which is great, but what about all the Wikipedians who continue to use it for the old use? How do you propose keeping on top of people inadvertently misusing it with the result of others being confused? --Dweller (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you will be joining us tomorrow afternoon at the Edit-a-thon at Tech Liminal, in Oakland. We'll be working on articles relating to women and democracy (and anything else that interests you). It's sponsored by the California League of Women Voters, Tech Liminal, and me.

If this is the first you are hearing of this event, my apologies for the last-minute notice! I announced it on the San Francisco email list and by a banner on your watchlist, but I neglected to look at the San Francisco invitation list until this evening. If you can't make it this time, I hope to see you at a similar event soon! -Pete (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Civility, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Civility (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Civility during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for creating this article. It was tagged for notability for 3 years but I've removed this and put my comments at the above link. I thought I'd let you know in case you wanted to comment. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Arabic Wikipedia community Thank you for your contributions in the establishment at the beginning (see here) شكراً جزيلاً --Trabelsiismail (talk) 12:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiknic 2013
Sunday, June 23rd · 12:34pm · Lake Merritt, Oakland
Theme: Hyperlocal list-making

This year's 2013 SF Wiknik will be held at Lake Merritt, next to Children's Fairyland in Oakland. This event will be co-attended by people from the hyperlocal Oakland Wiki. May crosspollination of ideas and merriment abound!

Location and Directions[edit]

• Location: The grassy area due south of Children's Fairyland (here) (Oakland Wiki)
  • Nearest BART: 19th Street
  • Nearest bus lines: NL/12/72
  • Street parking abounds

Template:Unsolved has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. McGeddon (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

to two upcoming Bay Area events:

• Maker Faire 2013, Sat/Sun May 18-19, San Mateo -- there will have a booth about Wikimedia, and we need volunteers to talk to the public and ideas for the booth -- see the wiki page to sign up!
• Edit-a-Thon 5, Sat May 25, 10-2pm, WMF offices in San Francisco -- this will be a casual edit-a-thon open to both experienced and new editors alike! Please sign up if on the wiki page if you can make it so we know how much food to get.

I hope you can join us at one or both! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 17:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathematics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantitative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a new editor on Wikipedia. I am interested in Alternative Medicine. I noticed the Burzynski Clinic article, so I tried to add some information to it.I tried to change the first paragraph, but Everything I changed was deleted several times, even though I sourced it. The first paragraph now has no sourcing and their definition of an "antineoplaston", is incorrect, so I tried to find the source and couldn't. So, I added the American Cancer Society's definition.(please see the article)I was told first that the American Cancer Society couldn't be used because it would make people think that the treatment was endorsed ( even though the American Cancer society is already listed as a source). I can't remember the other reason I was given. I tried to post on Dispute Resolution, but it was closed because two of the editors wanted to continue on Talk. We are not getting anywhere and there are about 5 editors that are of the same mindset. Is there anything I can do about this? Thank you!!Docia49 (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TieredDR.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of scandals involving American evangelical Christians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scandals involving American evangelical Christians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Land, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Foundation, Horizontal and Proportion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits to Land, as they seem to be generally incorrect, unencyclopedic, and not supported by the source provided. Specifically, land is not "dirt" (it includes a wide range of materials, primarily rock), it is not uniformly horizontal (following the curve of the planet's surface, and having a wide range of inclines. The phrase "foundation actual to human living" is unclear, and there is no sourced support for land having any "psychic" qualities, whatever that means. Also, I see no reason to hide the referenced material from the lede, stating that land, "sometimes referred to as dry land, is the solid surface of the Earth, that is not covered by water". Cheers! bd2412 T 14:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Native is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cnilep (talk) 04:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

here you go!

~THWC 15:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Living (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited!

File:Csaky madonna.jpg

Hi Stevertigo! The first Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 in San Francisco. Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Wikipedians of all experience levels are invited! Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here! SarahStierch (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Body, Meaning, Spiritual and Affirmation

Flow (psychology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mental state

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sourcemonkeys. Since you had some involvement with the Sourcemonkeys redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you intend to do anything with Wikipedia:Sourcehelpers? (proceed, withdraw, mark it as historical, etc..?) John Vandenberg ^(chat) 14:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - MrX 04:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robot, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Programming and Virtual agent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Martín Maldacena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entanglement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:RR. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:RR redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Launchballer 13:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sidestacking and pinching, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sidestacking and pinching and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Sidestacking and pinching during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elvey (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday, April 5 - WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited!

The University of California, Berkeley's Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend. Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history! The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library. You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 23:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Intel (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although there is nothing very wrong with having this page, I've already implemented a better disambiguation alternative: Hatnote disambiguation. (See WP:DAB.) As such, this page is redundant. Why should the reader spend a click and come here when he or she can simply go straight to the disambiguated destination?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:MFD/SV/ONS. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:MFD/SV/ONS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Annoying users. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Annoying users redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Launchballer 11:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few concerns. I think that you should clean up the grammar and some general santorum to avoid a retaliatory response. 208.54.44.224 (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahul Mahajan (blogger) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Mahajan (blogger) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quoted has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —TheDJ (Not WMF) (talk • contribs) 15:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are need per WP:V Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! → Litquake Edit-a-thon in San Francisco → Saturday, October 11, 2014, from 1-5 PM

The Edit-a-thon will occur in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Writers from all over the Bay Area and the world will be in town during the nine day festival, so the timing is just right for us to meet, create and improve articles about literature and writers. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. This event will include new editor training. Please bring your laptop. The venue: Wikimedia Foundation offices (149 New Montgomery Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105) – Google Maps view You must RSVP here — see you there! --Rosiestep (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArtAndFeminism (3/7) and International Women's Day (3/8)!

Dear fellow Wikipedian, In celebration of WikiWomen's History Month, the SF Bay Area Wikipedia community has two events in early March -- please consider attending! First, we have an ArtAndFeminism edit-a-thon, which will take place at the Kadist Art Foundation from 12 noon to 6pm on Saturday, March 7. We'll be one of many sites worldwide participating in this edit-a-thon on March 7th. So join us as we help improve Wikipedia's coverage of women artists and their works! Second, we will be celebrating International Women's Day with the International Women's Day edit-a-thon on Sunday, March 8 from 1pm to 5pm at the Wikimedia Foundation. Our editing focus will be on women, of course! I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] To opt out of future mailings about SF meetups, please remove your name from this list.

A tag has been placed on Parallel History Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Match rate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced WP:OR, delete per WP:NEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alakzi (talk) 20:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for having templated you, as you're obviously not new here. I have undone your unsourced edit to The Mothers of Invention. With a proper source explicitly backing the reference, the remark would be welcome. Otherwise it's a bit of wp:OR. - DVdm (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hard fort requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GAB (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Snap (military) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, and if it refers to an actual topic, it entirely fails to explain what it is in intelligible terms

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Expressive power has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced waffle

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTFORUM - if you persist in abusing Talk:Bitcoin as a forum for bizarre rants, I shall report the matter, and ask that you be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you no doubt remember, as a consequence of a 2010 ArbCom case concerning you, you were explicitly required to cite sources for all content you add to articles. [1] Since this restriction has never been lifted [2] your recent creation of unsourced articles on Snap (military) and Expressive power clearly violate the ArbCom ruling. I suggest that you bear this in mind in future, since I suspect that given your past history the community is unlikely to show much more patience with you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article stubbing is not a crime, as it takes time to write a global compendium project. I understand that you may not happy there in Bristol, but if the aristos-kleptos money they pay you was worth a nickel they would have built that nice and easy to engineer walking bridge to Paris by now and have hired actual Europeans to do it, (jobs!). Rather than mooching off the Free (democratic honor, try it) people's of the world, and the work we provide, try the opposite. -Stevertigo (t | c, ed. 2002) 14:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stevertigo, if you can't immediately add sources to Snap (military) and Expressive power they may qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G5. Your ban does not allow you to add unsourced material. Let us know if you plan to address this. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Ratings and rankings system, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Ratings and rankings system and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Ratings and rankings system during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 13:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to the discussion and consensus on the administrator noticeboard on incidents, you are indefinitely banned from editing Wikipedia by the community. You may appeal this ban to the Arbitration Committee. For further information on appealing this ban, please see here. Thank you, --ceradon (talk • edits) 10:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Definition of Art. Since you had some involvement with the Definition of Art redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rejection of profanity. Since you had some involvement with the Rejection of profanity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:PIMP. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:PIMP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. gobonobo ^{+ c} 07:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 了. Since you had some involvement with the 了 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appeal to fallacy. Since you had some involvement with the Appeal to fallacy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stevertigo/junksalvage, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stevertigo/junksalvage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Stevertigo/junksalvage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Divine presence, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]