User talk:NorthernThunder

This user may have left Wikipedia. NorthernThunder has not edited Wikipedia since July 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I often blank this page. You can assume I've read any messages left here. I may or may not reply on your talk page, or on the relevant article talk page, as the situation warrants.

/Archive 1

/Archive 2

/Archive 3

/Archive 4

/Archive 5

/Archive 6

The article Gilbert Rozon has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 12:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "needs global perspective" tag from the Town meeting page, since the article says the term is used primarily in the United States. If that's not the case, the article should say where else it's used; otherwise, the tag seemed to me like having a "needs global perspective" tag on an article about American football. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you aware that American football is played in other countries? NorthernThunder (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colorization is a noun, colorize is a verb (http://slovnik.seznam.cz/en-cz/word/?q=colorization&id=pyEGGYK5pd4) Uzerakount (talk) 07:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello NorthernThunder! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give National Press Building a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mikaey, Devil's advocate 07:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NorthernThunder, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishka Rais whether the article Fishka Rais should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Fishka Rais, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Clarityfiend (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In VE9EC, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page La Presse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Mike Milbury, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Brookline and Assault and battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mart McChesney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An actor who's only verifiable roles are two episodes of Star Trek and a minor movie from 1984. Does not meet WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NorthernThunder,

Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image has two issues: no rationale and concerns of fair use as a gallery. Unless both issues are resolved, this image has seven days until deletion. --George Ho (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ken Scott (screenwriter) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker^{talk to me} 03:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Serena Sande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:BIO, couldn't find anything that indicates she WP:GNG in an HighBeam, ProQuest or Google News Archives other than playing a couple of minor theater roles passing mentions in the local newspaper, roles like "nurse" or "doctor" doesn't indicate notability neither

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 22:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maxime Rémillard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have since supplied a reference, but PLEASE STOP CREATING UNREFERENCED BIOGRAPHIES OF LIVING PEOPLE!! I found your article due to a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people and I'm amazed that as you approach 1400 articles created you don't understand that we simply don't accept that any BLP should be unreferenced anymore. I've looked at some of your recent articles and most have references, but please ensure that ALL of them are referenced. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 09:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your condescending attitude is even less helpful. NorthernThunder (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Michael Snyder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Robofish (talk) 22:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The request for speedy deletion has been turned down, so I've turned it into a WP:PROD. See the article for details. Robofish (talk) 10:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of recurring Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maurice Breton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. YUL89YYZ (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NorthernThunder, you have new messages. I apologize for the mishap :( benzband (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joseph Harris Harper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bits and Bytes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Richard BB 12:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NorthernThunder. I saw your edit to Laureen Harper, so just wanted to make sure you are aware of the guidance at Wikipedia:Link rot. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gitane De Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PKT(alk) 20:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just recently noticed that you spent some time last fall trying to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Stephen Harper's family, so I wanted to ask that you take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's principle that notability is not inherited.

Specifically, a father, mother, sibling or child of a Prime Minister of Canada is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article if the only claim of notability you can make is the family relationship to a Prime Minister. Because being the spouse of the Prime Minister is a notable public role in its own right, the wives are different — but in general, any other family member of a PM is allowed to have an article only if they've established their own notability independently of the family relationship alone. (Ben Mulroney and Catherine Clark and Justin Trudeau and Alexandre Trudeau and Geoffrey Pearson, for example, have all done things that would have gotten them in here regardless of who their fathers were; Ben's and Geoffrey's other siblings, conversely, have not.) And, in turn, a person's name is not added to {{Stephen Harper}} unless they actually have a separate article, which actually makes a valid and properly sourced claim of genuine notability, to link to.

Admittedly, on the surface it might look to you like there's a double standard for Canada vis-à-vis the United States — you do seem inordinately fond of making that claim whether there's an actual basis for it or not — but there really isn't, because a family member of a US president still has to meet a notability guideline in their own right. The United States has a much more invasive media culture that actively digs into these people in greater depth and intrusiveness than is true almost anywhere else in the world, so it ends up being a little bit easier than usual for those family members to actually garner enough media coverage to get past a notability guideline, but they still have to to get past a notability guideline on their own and still do not automatically get their own article just because they exist.

The test you need to apply is whether the person you want to write about has garnered a reasonable volume of media coverage that is specifically about them, which demonstrates their own independent notability. In other words, if there are media sources out there in which Joseph or Margaret or Rachel Harper is the primary subject, then they might potentially qualify for their own articles — but if their names merely get mentioned in media sources whose primary subject is Stephen, then their names may be mentioned in Stephen's article but they do not qualify for their own. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why we should let the media decide the notability of a person but if that's Wikipedia policy then I will follow it otherwise we aer just allowing Wikipedia to become even more American-biased. NorthernThunder (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Um, because the existence of media coverage is the definition of what notability is? Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edward Ritchie Bellemare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eric John Bergbusch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Norman Frederick Henderson Berlis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marie Bernard-Meunier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leonard Michael Berry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jacques Bilodeau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Blair Birkett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alfred Pike Bissonnet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pierre-André Bissonnette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clegg Hoyt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clegg Hoyt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roy William Blake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mid-level unelected official, per WP:DIPLOMAT. Recently added references do not conclusively indicate otherwise.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleinzach 05:12, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roy William Blake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy William Blake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The article Barbara Richardson (diplomat) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:DIPLOMAT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleinzach 23:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. Diplomats are not notable. NorthernThunder (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomats are not automatically notable just for being diplomats — they are notable if reliable sources can be added to provide depth and context about their diplomatic careers, and are not notable if all you can add is a stub that just says "Barbara Richardson is a diplomat" and doesn't cite any sources to verify the fact or demonstrate why anyone should care.

Her role is significant enough that reliable sources probably can be added to make her notability more apparent — but notability is a question of the sourcing that can or cannot be provided about the person, and not something that all diplomats automatically get just for being diplomats. Is there a reason you seem to so persistently have trouble understanding the distinction between those two things? Bearcat (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Richardson (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Richardson (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

• Hi NorthernThunder , looking at the period of time tht the Barbara Richardson (diplomat) page has been around and the amount of edits seemigly back and forth, I'd say that the article needs a bit more work. I've voted to keep for now as I believe it has merit and she is notable. Itime is the essence I dar say (Solution55 (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The main page loads with the links to the different language portals all appearing at the left margin. NorthernThunder (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I misunderstand you, but that sounds like the way it's supposed to be. Why is that a problem? Huon (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you did understand me, aesthetically, it just looks wrong because it leaves a big white space in the middle. NorthernThunder (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me the main page looks roughly like this: File:Wikipedia Main Page.png. The interwiki links to versions in other languages are at the left. I don't see any white space in the middle. Huon (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to upload a screenshot of my desktop so I'll try to explain it again. The page at http://www.wikipedia.org/ has links to the different languages of Wikipedia. They are supposed to surround a Wikiglobe but they do not here. The Wikiglobe is at the top left and each language wiki hypertext link is directly below them in descending order. To the right is the rest of the page which is blank. NorthernThunder (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry, that was indeed a misunderstanding; we were talking about differeng "main pages". There was indeed a problem with the page you pointed to, but it seems to be resolved now. No idea what the problem was, and it would probably something outside the control of the English Wikipedia - nothing editors here could have helped with. Huon (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Philip Francis Brady, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Philip Francis Brady" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 16:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Truong Hoa Binh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tassedethe (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Blackwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Blackwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calgary City Council may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{legislature

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NorthernThunder, you are the creator of the Privacy Act, 1983 page from September 10, 2012. I'm hoping to clean up some of the Canada Privacy related topics, but I am quite a new editor and a little weary to Be bold on such an important Act. I was hoping that we could collaborate to make a couple of these pages better. I'll be in Talk! -Cheers RhodesArk (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a red link defeats the very nature of Wikipedia. If you see a red link, be bold and create an article for it. NorthernThunder (talk) 06:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vinny Argiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 02:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Royal Canadian Mounted Police may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
{{Infobox law enforcement agency MicroObject.asp?row=31&themeid=451&item=31| last=The Royal Collection| title=e-Gallery > Exhibitions > Queen & Commonwealth > Gifts > Badge of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police| publisher=Queen's Printer| accessdate=July 26, 2009| abroad. This unit is based in [[Ottawa]] with operations at 24 Sussex Drive and [[Harrington Lake]]] near [[Chelsea, Quebec]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men in politics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama is burdened with way too many categories already, and regular editors routinely try to trim the categories to only those that are absolutely essential. A "men in politics" category is not only inessential, but I would argue it is largely redundant. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK NorthernThunder (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marivel Taruc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marivel Taruc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article David Renan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.67.230.140.124 (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michel Auger (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one reference; subject may not meet WP:N or WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Parson's Cat (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:HarryGrenfellArchibald.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:AlexanderMacGillivrayYoung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jay_Switzer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denelle Balfour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denelle Balfour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skill testing question may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• obstacle to claiming a prize. The questions are also becoming easier.<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> For contests held in other countries but open to Canadians, a STQ must be asked of any

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've been adding {{information}} to a lot of uploads recently and was wondering if you would consider reviewing your uploads (mostly Canadian biographicla images), so that the {{information}} is brought to an enhanced standard as well as merely useful one :)

Thanks in advance. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK Will do when I have time. NorthernThunder (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rhonda Aldrich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to met WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NorthernThunder! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

The article Susan Hay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that the person who wins a mayoral election does not instantly become the incumbent mayor of a town or city the moment they've been declared the winner on election night — there's a transition period first, during which the outgoing mayor is still the incumbent, and the incoming one is only a mayor-elect. Ontario's new mayors are not actually taking office until December 1 — so Tony Antoniazzi can be added to the infobox in a supplementary field as mayor-elect, but for the duration of October and November Bill Enouy is still the actual mayor and cannot be removed from the infobox yet. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. NorthernThunder (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Talk:Privacy Act, 1983#Title. Mathew5000 (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Al Dubois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Longtime unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anne Marie La Traverse has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello NorthernThunder, and thanks for your contributions on Canadian topics! It's important not to leave these biographies of living people unsourced indefinitely, as they can be subject to vandalism. You need another reliable source, in addition to the links to IMDB, for a biography of a living person. See WP:USERGENERATED for an explanation. I didn't spot anything quickly about her other than the name of her employer, so I'm proposing the article for deletion. --Djembayz (talk) 21:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Overs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Overs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esquivalience ^t 05:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasiliki Maliaros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasiliki Maliaros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 07:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Canadian Independent Telephone Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been marked with tags for almost three years, showing no sources. May not meet WP:ORG and clearly nobody is keen to build or maintain the page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Air ♠ Combat _What's^{up, dog?} 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jody Vance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Vance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article CTV Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Canadian television show tagged since August 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Technical Knockout (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unsourced article about a television series, for which improved referencing cannot be located on either Google or ProQuest. A television series does not get an automatic WP:NMEDIA pass just because it exists; it must be reliably sourceable, but this isn't.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Environics Analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environics Analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Basil Monster 17:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basil Monster (talk • contribs)

Category:Industry Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellen David is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen David until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bilawal House I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the article is unfeferenced and the topic is non notable, maybe contain lots of wrong information also it have been written in very poor style

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ominictionary (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]